There are quite a few outright lies in this article. Consider these facts:
Remington has not been “held accountable”. Remington ceased to exist as an organization long before this. This was four insurance companies setteling a lawsuit, without any input from Remington.
What the families argued and what is reality is not the same.
The idea that manufacturers should be held liable when their products are used in crime is not mainstream. It is insane.
There has never been any proven link between Lanza and Remington or Remington’s advertising. The idea that an ad promoting a rifle as masculine promotes the murder of innocent children is laughable.
Winning an argument with stupid is a waste of time. Stupid is to the bone, beauty is skin deep. The gun, a knife, and a rock are inanimate objects add azzholes or Alec Baldwin then things go bad. It’s why I carry.
Wasn’t it Lanza’s mom that bought the rifle?