Posted on 02/17/2022 6:58:12 PM PST by buckalfa
Their brand of “antiracism” is racism.
Antiracism = Anti-White
“Taxes on nonprofit hospitals that exclude patients of color”
Where would those hospitals be, since that is illegal??
I would bet what they mean is they would LIKE to do a wealth transfer from hospitals in red states to blue states in the name of “equity.”
Bkmk
More than one race can play this game, you udiots
IDIOTS
America in 2022: A Nation in Awash in Over-Titled Under-Achievers.
Only one solution to this racial dystopia we’re living in - SEPARATION.
Let each race go their own way and determine its destiny.
As it stands, the dynamics are such that things are only going to get worse. Blacks will continue to milk their victimhood privilege for all it’s worth, demands will only get more shrill as they become even less responsible. Whites will continue to knuckle under and give in to the demands and self-flagellate themselves in droves in the vain attempt to relieve themselves of the sins they didn’t commit.
Do you agree?
Nope...I don’t believe all blacks are the same, like whites, asians, mexicans, etc. Aren’t the same. It’s about morals. Would you separate from Clarence Thomas? Candace Owens?
Separating the left from the right, maybe. An all-White state is no guarantee of sanity. Look at Vermont, which has virtually no non-Whites. They vote like a bad neighborhood in Chicago. Let stupid, gullible Whites and other self-loathing racial groups congregate together and destroy themselves. Godless totalitarian Stalinazis of all colors should live in their own dystopian hellhole far away from the rest of us normals.
I’m sure Hamas just loves hair boy!
Yes I agree. The ideal of equality in the Declaration has been perverted to equity, thus ensuring endless class struggles.
“Nope...I don’t believe all blacks are the same, like whites, asians, mexicans, etc.”
That is correct, but you’re making a straw man argument.
Of course there are wonderful people of every race, but what counts is what the “AVERAGE” person of a particular race is like, ie, what hundred of years of interactions with the various races has revealed.
For example, let’s say you have two groups of people who on AVERAGE have significantly different IQ’s, AND whose members are easily identifiable as belonging to one or the other group. Assuming there is absolutely no discrimination and people are rewarded strictly on the basis of merit, which group do you think will end up with the most menial jobs? Which group of students will end up performing poorly?
And what do you think will be the reaction of the group who are at the bottom rung of the ladder? Will they not strongly resent their low position on the totem pole? Will they not question the fairness of the system, after all the constitution says “we’re all created equal”. Will they not demand that the other group addresses and fix their grievances? Will not all the “compassionate” easily guilted do-gooders of the better performing group sympathize with the plight of the other group and submit to every one of their demands?
Is this not the state we find ourselves in?
“Separating the left from the right, maybe. An all-White state is no guarantee of sanity. Look at Vermont, which has virtually no non-Whites.”
Yes value system differences are also a fault line in the peaceful coexistence of a society. Differences in religion being a prime example.
And Vermont is a great example of the benefits of NOT having too many differences in a society either racially or philosophically - an all white, overwhelmingly liberal state where people coexist very peacefully. Same with Scandinavian countries.
For a long time Utah, Idaho and other western states were examples of overwhelmingly white but CONSERVATIVE societies who also lived in blissful harmony. That has started to change with changes in demography.
And I’m sure Africa had many countries or tribes that had peaceful coexistence.
So if you want live rather peacefully, a more homogeneous population is the way to go.
That though can have some drawbacks in that it may become too stagnant and boring. So having a bit of “irritants” or diversity of thought can help a society progress.
After all, it does take the irritation of a grain of sand to make a pearl.
So a bit of stimulation is fine and desirable. Too much can lead to a miserable life.
I think in this country we’ve reached the point of having way too much.
Do you agree?
As I said, I’d prefer to keep a nation open to those that share similar ideals and values. If you come here to pervert them, roll up the welcome mat. At the moment, however, we need at least a 20-year moratorium on legal immigration to begin to assimilate them, perhaps longer. But there’s a whole laundry list of problems that need addressing.
“Global Health Equity”
aka White Genocide
We need to start treating anti-white racism as racism.
That would be racist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.