Separating the left from the right, maybe. An all-White state is no guarantee of sanity. Look at Vermont, which has virtually no non-Whites. They vote like a bad neighborhood in Chicago. Let stupid, gullible Whites and other self-loathing racial groups congregate together and destroy themselves. Godless totalitarian Stalinazis of all colors should live in their own dystopian hellhole far away from the rest of us normals.
“Separating the left from the right, maybe. An all-White state is no guarantee of sanity. Look at Vermont, which has virtually no non-Whites.”
Yes value system differences are also a fault line in the peaceful coexistence of a society. Differences in religion being a prime example.
And Vermont is a great example of the benefits of NOT having too many differences in a society either racially or philosophically - an all white, overwhelmingly liberal state where people coexist very peacefully. Same with Scandinavian countries.
For a long time Utah, Idaho and other western states were examples of overwhelmingly white but CONSERVATIVE societies who also lived in blissful harmony. That has started to change with changes in demography.
And I’m sure Africa had many countries or tribes that had peaceful coexistence.
So if you want live rather peacefully, a more homogeneous population is the way to go.
That though can have some drawbacks in that it may become too stagnant and boring. So having a bit of “irritants” or diversity of thought can help a society progress.
After all, it does take the irritation of a grain of sand to make a pearl.
So a bit of stimulation is fine and desirable. Too much can lead to a miserable life.
I think in this country we’ve reached the point of having way too much.
Do you agree?