Zero Hedge has been sharply critical of Biden and posted stories about allegations of wrongdoing by his son Hunter.
“US Intelligence Officials” are now media critics.
“The officials said Zero Hedge, which has 1.2 million Twitter followers, published articles created by Moscow-controlled media that were then shared by outlets and people unaware of their nexus to Russian intelligence.”
So what? I get a lot of my News from outlets like the BBC and France24 because, despite their god-awful liberal slant, I’m not hearing regurgitated Biden/Psaki talking-points. Am I reading British & French Intelligence? Maybe. But I have a brain and common-sense.
Zero Hedge is far more reliable than the MSM or the US “intellegence community”.
Zero Hedge is BANNED here in FR.
You cannot post any article on Zero Hedge here at all.
“.......critical of Biden”
In today’s USSA, criticizing Dear Leader is treasonous.
Zero Hedge is absolutely pro-Russian. The founder is Daniel Ivandjiiski, whose father was part of the Soviet controlled puppet regime in Bulgaria.
His anti-American bias may stem in part from his being barred from the securities industry for insider trading. Not sure, but he certainly despises the United States of America.
ZeroHedge is not a ring wing site
Thus sayeth the Ministry of Truth....................
The old saying is when you hit the target, you take flak.
aNyOnE wHo QuEsTiOnS tHe GoVeRnMeNt Is a TeRrOrIsT.
Of course it has.
For as long as I remember.
Aren’t these the same exact US Intelligence Officials that spread Russian Collusion LIES and Propaganda for 5 years??
Then we have Business Insider, shills for the rats and the ChiComs.
Zero Hedge is cr@p.
and so what?
Is there still a 1st amendment in this country?
Will they start to seize websites next?
I think we should expect logging in to FR someday soon and being greeted by the FBI banner.
Zero Hedge is “conservative”, who knew?
I guess anyone who isn’t a globalist woke liberal is now deemed “conservative”.
Oh, and peaceful trucker protesters are “terrorists”.
Zero Hedge denied the claims and said it tries to “publish a wide spectrum of views that cover both sides of a given story.”
**************
Publishing a diversity of views is apparently seen as a threat to the regime.
I seem to recall a recent article (or video on youtube) describing how the Chinese had bought space in major newspapers to place “ads” that were designed to look like news and promote china’s posistions ie: propaganda.