the term ‘plain clothes’ usually denotes an non-uniformed agent of a police force. I see nothing in this video/article that would support a claim of being an undercover agent of a police force. Not saying these were not colluding, only questioning who they were ‘colluding for’.
Then a simple question would be who is the identified woman kicking the window? Who is she? Where is she? What is the disposition of her case?
the term ‘plain clothes’ usually denotes an non-uniformed agent of a police force. I see nothing in this video/article that would support a claim of being an undercover agent of a police force. Not saying these were not colluding, only questioning who they were ‘colluding for’.
**********************
It’s Gateway Pundit.Do you actually expect them to have proof or the body of the article to match the crazy headline?