The government was going around doing the same thing during the blm riots. People on the 'l' and 'r' get played all the time. Divide and conquer works.Umbrella man, still not charged.
Posted on 02/13/2022 9:47:58 AM PST by bitt
Article Written by Nick Mastrangelo and Laura Elizabeth Jenkins at americangulag.org
American Gulag obtained this footage from Tommy Tatum showing a small group of unidentified individuals working in tandem to break a window on Jan. 6th.
In this video, a black-hooded man carries an Asian woman dressed in red, with a red hood, a US flag scarf, and a MAGA hat, onto the window sill on the west side of the Capitol Building.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
p
I hope that guy breaking the window in the last second of the video is being prosecuted.
the term ‘plain clothes’ usually denotes an non-uniformed agent of a police force. I see nothing in this video/article that would support a claim of being an undercover agent of a police force. Not saying these were not colluding, only questioning who they were ‘colluding for’.
Sanford Horwitt prefaces his biography of Alinski, “Let Them Call Me Rebel”, with an anecdote he felt illuminated Alinsky’s method. In this anecdote, Alinsky shares his wisdom with students wishing to protest the appearance on their campus of the first George Bush, then America’s representative to the UN during the Vietnam War:College student activists in the 1960s and 1970s sought out Alinsky for advice about tactics and strategy. On one such occasion in the spring of 1972 at Tulane University’s annual week-long series of events featuring leading public figures, students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest for a scheduled speech by George Bush, then U. S. representative to the United Nations, a speech likely to be a defense of the Nixon Administration’s Vietnam War policies [Note: the Nixon Administration was then negotiating with the North Vietnamese Communists to arrive at a peace agreement-DH] The students told Alinsky that they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush’s address. “That’s the wrong approach”, he rejoined–“not very relevant” and besides, causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school [Not very likely-DH] He told them, instead, to go hear the speech dressed up as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards, reading ‘The K.K.K. supports Bush.’ And that is what the students did with very successful, attention-getting results.
This vignette tells you everything your really need to know about Alinsky’s ethics and his attitude towards means and ends. Lenin once said that the purpose of a political argument is not to refute your opponent ‘ but to wipe him from the face of the earth.’ The mission of Alinsky radicals is a mission of destruction.
Source: Boiling The American Frog
I saw photos of a kid that broke windows in the Capitol on 1/6.
This may be a stupid question, but: Can Donald Trump file a lawsuit against any of these govt entities who were clearly working to take him down? Can he sue ChoMoeJoe or Hilldog without having to wait for prosecution? Sure, it would be a long shot but he can afford the legal fees. It would if nothing else be a constant irritant to them. (Lights a cigar, waits to get shot down.)
Oh, I believe the “DH” referenced a couple of times in that piece is David Horowitz, who (I believe) is the original source of the anecdote.
The Trump/Russia scam was created to get rid of Trump from the presidency.
The Ukraine call by Trump was investigated in order to try to impeach Trump and get rid of him from the presidency.
The Jan 6 capitol break-in was CREATED by Pelosi and democrats in order to keep Trump from running for the presidency.
Every thing the democrats have done against Trump, including creating scams and doing unwarranted investigations, were all meant to get rid of Trump or prevent him from getting into the presidency.
When Jan 6 investigations end up doing nothing to prevent Trump from running, democrats will create another scam or sham investigation to keep Trump from the presidency.
Hillary’s campaign is now under investigation for collusion to keep Trump out of the White House. Pelosi and Schumer and a large part of the liberal media, need to be investigated for creating so many sham scams, not only against Trump, but against many other republicans. Pelosi needs to be indicted for her role in the Jan 6 ‘break-in’. She created that scandal.
Then a simple question would be who is the identified woman kicking the window? Who is she? Where is she? What is the disposition of her case?
the term ‘plain clothes’ usually denotes an non-uniformed agent of a police force. I see nothing in this video/article that would support a claim of being an undercover agent of a police force. Not saying these were not colluding, only questioning who they were ‘colluding for’.
**********************
It’s Gateway Pundit.Do you actually expect them to have proof or the body of the article to match the crazy headline?
“I saw photos of a kid that broke windows in the Capitol on 1/6.”
Did you?
How come you are more interested in demeaning gateway pundit than what happened?
I can’t really see much of anything. The American flag blocks the view. I don’t see how you can conclude anything other than that there were a bunch of people crowded near the windows and someone climbed up to the window. I don’t see any basis for calling anyone “plainclothes,” implying that it’s a police officer. Not saying it didn’t happen, but this brief video shows or proves nothing of significance.
The US government is clearly the enemy of freedom.
‘new’ footage? Really?
No. There is no new footage. Only the latest in a planned timed rollout of footage.
Hmmmmmmm......
The government was going around doing the same thing during the blm riots. People on the 'l' and 'r' get played all the time. Divide and conquer works.Umbrella man, still not charged.
sunny bonobo wrote: “It’s Gateway Pundit. Do you actually expect them to have proof or the body of the article to match the crazy headline?”
Nothing like click bait to attract web views. The problem is there are many who will take that headline as proof.
That the people dressed as MAGA were coordinated with people dressed like ANTIFA is what is important. Using language implying those dressed as MAGA were cops detracts from what Occam's razor shows. ANTIFA had a few dressed like Trump supporters up front for the cameras to see, the news to have someone to blame, and provide cover for the rest of ANTIFA as they stormed the capital. Instead of explaining this they just have a headline and someone else's video as all caps "BREAKING NEWS STORY".
This leaves the reader having to infer what the story is, instead of reading the story as written. When the subject of the story is related to anything conspiracy, having to read between the lines to figure out what is said feeds into the sense of conspiracy the reader has, without actually saying anything. So the way they write stories are written is a form of manipulation. As if we aren't manipulated enough by the news as is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.