Posted on 02/12/2022 4:00:10 PM PST by kiryandil
Gray wolves will regain federal protection across most of the lower 48 United States following a court ruling Thursday that struck down a Trump Administration decision to take the animals off the endangered species list.
Senior District Judge Jeffrey S. White, of United States District Court for the Northern District of California, found that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, in declaring wolf conservation a success and removing the species from federal protection, did not adequately consider threats to wolves outside of the Great Lakes and Northern Rocky Mountains where they have rebounded most significantly.
Although the decision to delist wolves came under the Trump administration, the Biden administration has defended it in court.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I’m a hillbilly and I think I have a good idea. Let’s trap as many Wolves as we can on the northern part of the states and give them a ride down to the southern border and turn them loose. Whata you thank Buford?
—
Better yet, release them inside D.C. . A more native habitat for a vicious predator species I can’t imagine.
there is defending and then there is defending. I don’t know if this is the case but a lot of times liberals will purposely loose court cases because loosing and getting what you want is a lot easier then trying to win. Lot of government consent decrees are ways of giving power to government in the bureaucratic realm
First S yes, second I pick up my brass, third leave, fourth last S. A tag is just for looks here in the bonny NW.
I was thinking the Wolves would be guard “dogs” against the illegals; scare them back across the border.
believe the science when it suits you is the theme of today's world....
The Wolfs are needed at the southern border to thin out the tourists.
Revelation 6:8
“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.
And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.”
Yes. My point is that the animal is endangered only if it is endangered “globally”.
If there were only 100 wolves in the whole world, maybe some drastic protection measurements would be justified?!
But!
Animals, which are only rare in the USA or better, rare in some part of one of the states, should never be treated as endangered.
Local lack of particular animal does not (shall not) make it endangered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.