Skip to comments.
Driving in Circles Is Not a Crime
2/11/22
| Chad N. Freud
Posted on 02/11/2022 7:21:48 PM PST by Chad N. Freud
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: metmom
Right . . . with enough vehicles, a vehicle may only pass a given point every fifteen or thirty minutes, thus negating any anti-cruising law.
21
posted on
02/11/2022 7:58:28 PM PST
by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
To: Chad N. Freud
To: Chad N. Freud
Not every jurisdiction had a drag worth cruising.
The result in my local, two drive-ins closed as did a pizza place and some fast food joints...loss of sales tax revenue to the town.
23
posted on
02/11/2022 8:02:51 PM PST
by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: metmom
"How are they going to arrest someone in a moving vehicle?"
???
Failure to stop for the Po-Po in Texas is a felony, ie felony stop worthy of being shot.
24
posted on
02/11/2022 8:08:50 PM PST
by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: Deaf Smith
“Failure to stop for the Po-Po in Texas is a felony, ie felony stop worthy of being shot.”
Such a felony stop should help traffic flow.
25
posted on
02/11/2022 8:14:06 PM PST
by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
To: Deaf Smith
That would not end well for the police.
If they start shooting, the country comes apart.
26
posted on
02/11/2022 8:20:31 PM PST
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
To: Chad N. Freud
Then it becomes a traffic alert due to Police Activity.
27
posted on
02/11/2022 8:22:10 PM PST
by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: Deaf Smith
“Then it becomes a traffic alert due to Police Activity.”
Exactly.
The cause of the traffic delay then becomes shared between the convoy and the government agents.
28
posted on
02/11/2022 8:38:02 PM PST
by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
To: Deaf Smith
Plus, you jumped to a felony-stop scenario (”???”) when metmom simply asked “”How are they going to arrest someone in a moving vehicle?”
I think the question posed was “what probable cause would police have to pull over a vehicle that is moving and proceeding in an orderly fashion in (congested) traffic?”
29
posted on
02/11/2022 8:49:28 PM PST
by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
To: Chad N. Freud
I thought they meant this...
30
posted on
02/11/2022 8:51:55 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Chad N. Freud
Anything the police want...one was not observed staying evenly in their lane, not signaling far enough in advance or for too long as a examples.
31
posted on
02/11/2022 8:55:38 PM PST
by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: Chad N. Freud
Some states and cities have anti-cruising laws.
32
posted on
02/11/2022 9:35:02 PM PST
by
Reno89519
(FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
To: Chad N. Freud
Someone should set up a hotline where people can order a burger delivered by a big rig for $100 (which would be like a donation to the cause). Then dispatch drivers in the convoy for the pickup and delivery. And only pickup and deliver where you want to demonstrate.
Imagine thousands of truck drivers picking up a dollar burger somewhere and driving it somewhere close by to drop off.
If the police try to arrest a driver, or tow or pull over a truck, all of the trucks nearby should surround the one the police are targeting so that it cannot go anywhere. Rinse. Repeat.
They’re probably endless ways to achieve their outcome.
And in the end the nation depends on the truckers. And I’m guessing the court of public opinion is going to side with them and their simple demand.
33
posted on
02/11/2022 10:12:03 PM PST
by
unlearner
(Si vis pacem, para bellum. Let him who desires peace prepare for war.)
To: Chad N. Freud
Continuing to orbit a block *is* illegal in many places, due to ‘anti-cruising’ ordinances.
34
posted on
02/11/2022 10:13:28 PM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Chad N. Freud
35
posted on
02/11/2022 10:14:47 PM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Chad N. Freud
36
posted on
02/12/2022 7:09:29 PM PST
by
redinIllinois
(Pro-life, accoountant, gun-totin' Grandma - multi issue voter )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson