| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Over half the deaths seen by this funeral director were likely caused by the COVID vaccines, 3RIVRS wrote: |
What, exactly, is a “strange” clot? If he has no data from before May 2021 to compare this “data” is useless. |
*
"....this “data” is useless."
Classic. Thats the go-to post for those trying, and failing, to make exposure of the truth go away.
He has extensive years of experience and never saw these clots until vax rollout. His peers have years of experience and have never seen these clots until vax rollout. The 'strange' clots are described in the FR thread with Transcript linked at the bottom.
Classic. Thats the go-to post for those trying, and failing, to make exposure of the truth go away.
****************************************
These people are in such denial, they will never see the truth even if they are the ones that end up in the hospital with their colleagues killing them.
My sister has seen it all, heart attacks, blood clots, cancer, paralysis, even a 17 year old boy that was found sitting in his car in a like a vegetable.
When she asks about their Covid 19 vaccination status. She said they immediately get defensive and say that has nothing to do with it.
Denial is a powerful thing, especially for “know it all” doctors.
I watched the whole thing and then me and Mr K (not the one on this forum) watched the Dr Ruby 30-minute interview on the S Peters show.
During the video posted, I stopped the vid and said to Mr K that one possible problem could be that blood coagulates in a dead person’s arteries so finding big clots might not be that unusual - EXCEPT that there are laws about how many hours can elapse before you take your departed loved one to the mortuary. Also I was aware from all my years of typing medical reports that an embalmer has to remove as much of the blood from a deceased person as he can - there are various ways of doing this - so formaldehyde can be injected.
Mr Hirschman addressed both of those issues almost right as I started playback again. It’s clear he knows what he’s talking about and addressing an anomaly, then researching what he’s observed by contacting other embalmers and comparing notes. In both the interviews I saw, there was no feeling of someone reading from notes except on the interviewer’s part.
This is all very believable.
And whatever an embalmer sees - again, this is addressed in the interviews - he is not doing an autopsy, so he can only surmise what killed the person. He has no legal right to examine medical records or quiz the family - which would pretty much kill his business and violate his professional standards, and leave him open to lawsuits, etc.
I worked for vascular surgeons in the past. One of their top jobs is to find and destroy clots in the arteries and veins of living persons - before the clots destroy that person. I’ve transcribed many a procedure where the doctor pulls a long piece of “fibrous” clot out of a person (who started going to the doctor because s/he was in a hellish amount of pain) - how long a piece? Except for very unusual cases, the longest piece of clot we’re talking about was 2-3 inches. Most they are coagulated stuff, rarely fibrinous. The clots this guy and his buds were finding were, like, sometimes more than a foot long. He couldn’t inject the formaldehyde because the vein was impenetrable.
Especially Pfizer is on record as having to make big payouts to people harmed by its concoctions.
Why defend these guys? At least look stuff up on your own and try to find out the truth. Whether something touted as a preventive against a certain disease (clearly, it’s not, as the call for repeated “boosters” has shown) is actually killing people is a pretty big deal.
If I end up being wrong, it’s not that big of a deal. I might die of SARS-CoV2 or from not being able to get into my favorite restaurant (just kidding! there are no good restaurants!) or from some other reason - no skin off your nose.
But if I’m right, it’s a really, really big deal.