Posted on 02/05/2022 10:00:52 AM PST by ransomnote
PING
This article is dumb. Why would someone who is NOT vaccinated post anything on the “VACCINE ADVERSE REACTION” site?
It’s right in the name
Was not vaccinated with the COVID vaccine… read the title again slowly.
It goes back 30 years, and is almost entirely those cases prior to Corona.
VAERS is not a COVID site. It covers ALL vaccine adverse reactions. Yet almost all those reported occurred following a WuFlu shot.
Either those 17 (?) entries were a mistake (or a stupidity), or as has been noted before, VAERS events within 14 days of the jab itself are considered UNVAXXED.
I’m leaning toward the latter interpretation. Thus, someone wanted it entered into the VAERS database despite the cognitive dissonance (introduced by gubmint interpretation).
If the information is from the CDC and VAERS, one or both them should be the link, not some second-hand BS.
There were warnings about the potential of clots post vaccination at the git go.
My wife and I are in our 80’s.
I was on Eliquis a blood thinner due to having a stent installed and a daily baby aspirin. Both my cardio doc, stent doc and primary care Doc told me not to DC the Eliquis or Baby Aspirin before or after the injection of the vaccine.
My wife was told by her family doc to continue taking her baby aspirin before and after her vaccinations.
We got our Pfizer shots on 01/31/21 and 2/21/21.
One of our shots came from a potentially dangerous batch #.
So, some medical people were aware of the potential of clots post vaccination.
The Daily Sceptic
A study published this week in JAMA finds the risk of myocarditis increased up to 133-fold following Covid vaccination, raising serious questions of vaccine safety, especially for young males.
https://mobile.twitter.com/LD_Sceptics/status/1486410142413381641
More:
Myocarditis Risk Increases Up To 133-FOLD Following Covid Vaccination, Study Finds
A study published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has found that the risk of myocarditis (heart inflammation) after receiving an mRNA Covid vaccine (Pfizer or Moderna) was dramatically increased across many age groups and was highest after the second vaccination dose in young men.
The study found myocarditis reports were highest after the second vaccination dose in males aged 12 to 15 years at 70.7 per million Pfizer doses, compared to an expected rate of 0.53 per million, amounting to a 133-fold increase; in males aged 16 to 17 years at 105.9 per million Pfizer doses, compared to an expected rate of 1.34 per million, amounting to a 79-fold increase; and in young men aged 18 to 24 years at 52.4 per million Pfizer doses and 56.3 per million Moderna doses, compared to an expected rate of 1.76 per million, amounting to a 30-fold and 32-fold increase respectively. The full results are shown in the table below and a selection are depicted in the chart above. ...
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Of the 19,756 cases in VAERS where a patient's symptom is blood clots, only 17 (.09 of one percent) cases published to VAERS were NOT 'vaccinated' with the Covid 'vaccine'., SaxxonWoods wrote: |
If the information is from the CDC and VAERS, one or both them should be the link, not some second-hand BS. |
Your first and only instinct is to attack to try to discredit VAERS data, but the data I posted is accurate and published to VAERS. You can extract patient IDs in this database and compare it to the VAERS database and get the same patient records because they use the same data set..
The CDC releases the VAERS dataset weekly, and organizations/researchers and others then use that dataset in their own programs, or simple applications like Excel, to analyze the data.
This website, medalerts.org picks up the CDC's VAERS data releases and makes it available to the public. This is done because VAERS is intentionally ridiculous - with fuzzy logic and data display limitations that make no sense (e.g., your search returned 39 thousand records, but VAERS can only display results for 10 thousand, so you're told to break the data into pieces (e.g., separate reports for men and women, or separate reports for various age groups), export it and then put it back together in the down stream application.
This data I posted accurately reflects VAERS data.
So “clot shot”.
“...cases published to VAERS...”
The poster was correct. Why would you publish to VAERS...” adverse events of the NON-VACCINATED?
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Of the 19,756 cases in VAERS where a patient's symptom is blood clots, only 17 (.09 of one percent) cases published to VAERS were NOT 'vaccinated' with the Covid 'vaccine'., gloryblaze wrote: |
It goes back 30 years, and is almost entirely those cases prior to Corona. |
*
99.9% of 'thrombosis' cases in VAERS were reported post Covid-19 'vaccination.
.01% of thrombosis cases were reported to VAERS prior to Covid 'vaccines'.
Again you people miss the point.
“NOT ‘vaccinated’ with the Covid ‘vaccine’.” They are talking about reports involving Covid, not ALL vaccines.
UNVACCINATED events need not report.
Yes, I understand the data.
“I’m leaning toward the latter interpretation. Thus, someone wanted it entered into the VAERS database despite the cognitive dissonance (introduced by gubmint interpretation).”
You could very well be CORRECT, but you are answering the wrong question.
Thank you.
What do you consider to be the correct question?
The box with the largest number - 20,277 - has no description. What does that number represent.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Of the 19,756 cases in VAERS where a patient's symptom is blood clots, only 17 (.09 of one percent) cases published to VAERS were NOT 'vaccinated' with the Covid 'vaccine'., Steve_Seattle wrote: |
The box with the largest number - 20,277 - has no description. What does that number represent. |
*
Some people received more than one vaccination in one sitting. It looks like about 500 people out of about 20,000 received more than one vaccination at a doctor's visit. So the patient report of a clot is counted toward both (or more) vaccines received at that visit. SO the largest number is about 500 case counts over the number of individual patients. The box at the bottom of the table may explain it better than I have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.