Posted on 01/29/2022 7:02:57 PM PST by ConservativeMind
Patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) prescribed full-dose blood thinners are significantly more likely to experience heavy bleeding than patients prescribed a smaller yet equally effective dose.
The research, which compared the safety and effectiveness of blood clot treatment strategies for more than 150 critically ill COVID-19 patients at two hospitals, found that almost all patients who experienced significant bleeding were mechanically ventilated and receiving full-dose anticoagulants (blood thinners).
The results may inform treatment guidelines for blood clots in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, who are at an increased risk for both blood clots and severe bleeding. Previous reports have found that 17% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients experience blood clots, says Maya Chilbert, PharmD.
"A wide variety of practice exists when it comes to approaching blood clots in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and there is little data to suggest improved outcomes using one strategy versus another," says Chilbert. "Caution should be used in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 when selecting a regimen to treat blood clots, and the decision to use full-dose blood thinners should be based on a compelling indication rather than lab markers alone."
The study analyzed the outcome of blood clot treatments and the rate of bleeding events for more than 150 patients with COVID-19 who received either of two blood thinner regimens: a full-dose based on patient levels of D-dimer (a protein present in the blood after a blood clot dissolves), and the other a smaller but higher-than-standard dosage.
Nearly 14% of patients who received full-dose blood thinners experienced a significant bleeding event, compared to only 3% of patients who received a higher-than-standard dosage. All patients who experienced bleeding events were mechanically ventilated. No difference was reported in the regimens' effectiveness at treating blood clots.
(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...
Bkmrk
Was the need for blood thinners to prevent blood clots due to medical history of being "vaccineted" and "boosted"?
I had the J&J just over a month ago. Lots of muscle pains these days - I’m getting a d-dimer test this week.
Noticed that, too.
Curiously, the study is well-protected, hiding behind published media templates, the OP being one of them, and behind a paywall.
Here’s the study’s abstract:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00185787211066456
“Regimen A” vs “Regimen B”
$42 required to reveal the true identity.
Blood thinners and steroids is what I was given at the hospital. Blood still seeps from the sinus four moths on and the blood does not look like the blood of a dry sinus.
I bet you would knock out 75% of the clot related issues with no ICU and no hyper-expensive drugs.
Wonder how many of these patients were denied early treatment with something efficacious...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.