Posted on 01/29/2022 2:33:37 PM PST by logi_cal869
However, on table 9 of the ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ dataset, the ONS have inadvertently provided enough details on deaths among children and teenagers by vaccination status for us to calculate the mortality rates ourselves, and to put it bluntly, they are horrifying, and make it obvious as to why the ONS chose to exclude children from the mortality rates dataset.
- snip -
And on table 9, the ONS have provided us with the number of deaths by vaccination status among children and teenagers, and have kindly also provided us with the person-years, meaning we can calculate the mortality rate per 100,000 person years for 10-14 year olds, and 15-19 year olds by vaccination status.
- snip -
To work out the mortality-rate per 100,000 person years all we need to now do is divide the person-years by 100,000, and then divide the number of deaths by the answer to that equation.
So for 10-14 year-olds we perform the following calculation –
2,094,711 (person-years) / 100,000 = 20.94711
96 (deaths) / 20.94711 = 4.58
Therefore, the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among unvaccinated 10-14-year-olds is 4.58 deaths per 100,000 person-years between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21.
By using the same formula we find that the the mortality rate among unvaccinated 15-19-year-olds is 10.08 deaths per 100,000 person-years.
Now all we have to do is use the same formula to calculate the mortality rate among one-dose vaccinated and two dose vaccinated 10-14, and 15-19 year-olds, by using the person-years and number of deaths provided by the ONS in table 9 of their ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ report,
(Excerpt) Read more at dailyexpose.uk ...
It's a bunch of made up trash to attract Qtards and persons
with limited or damaged cognitive abilities. Like you, apparently.<
Do the vaccines work? Doesn't look like it. Are they dangerous? Maybe so.
That doesn't mean a bunch of click-hounds get to make up
fantasies about it. Dumb fantasies, at that.
You go ahead and believe that little microscopic bionic seamonkees
are turning people into rubber. Whatever floats your boat.
Just keep in mind that the day will come when you realize that
you fell for a bunch of clickbait trash and were being a total tool.
Fear porn serves to create fear and sell clicks.
It is difficult to spread truth with out it. Most of these articles are semi truth.
Boom and bombshell bing keywords come to mind.
;-)
Thanks for posting.
I think it is possible for both sides to be largely wrong. I don’t think it is possible for both sides to be largely correct.
Most data is cr@p. I think the U.K. stuff may be decent.
At least some people get some definite short and medium term benefits from the vaccine. If one is some combination of past one’s third score and/or past one’s 6th to 9th stone (depending on height) one probably ought to consider the short and medium term benefits. Not being dead is a benefit, but the older you are, the more that is a short or medium term benefit, and not a long-term one.
The long term benefits and long term risks are unknown, the short and medium term risks are hard to gauge.
With the unknown (bad information, or people in authority or that one has contact with opting to act on what one perceives as bad information) fear naturally kicks in.
Times are hard But at least it isn’t actually the bubonic plague.
bookmark
“At least some people get some definite short and medium term benefits from the vaccine.”
A reward that let’s them travel, See mom and pop in the old age home, able to participate in highschool and sports. Not wear a mask, go to a concert or take a cruise. Yep pretty a “short and medium” term reward.
They might even get to work.
Yep. A teenage hockey player in Toronto dropped dead a week or two ago. It looked to be medium term, but only ended up being short term.
Travel is a bigger thing. it’s been over two years since I’ve seen my folks.
If one is young, it is hard to see the long term.
I think that in most locals the unvaxxed can still find something—I may be wrong. It is a good excuse if you don’t want to work. but our society is pretty good at dishing those up any way you want them.
I know many who were told. “Get the vax or you are fired.” People who have had 1, 4, 10, 15 or 30 years at the same place they worked for. No vax no job. Some of them even worked with out vax for the duration of the pandemic and they called them heros before.
Finding something is not the same thing as keeping your job. I am very fortunate in that the administration at my school is very libertarian and anti-vax, but I realize that my situation is unusual. I know most people in the west are not as fortunate.
Finding something when you are forced out of a long time career because you don’t comply with the new rule of the day. Which never existed before and had no bearing on the job you do or performance of the job you did for many years, is definitely different then finding something because you are ready to switch jobs. They you find the same requirements for the other jobs you might apply for. Geeze. Weird times.
I find quite the same. The "if it bleeds, it leads" mentality of the media -- note, I did not use the word "press" -- seems continually pitched at a level of hysteria which clutters discussions aimed at getting to truths, big and little.
That even on this thread, there is puerile name-calling suggests that getting at some truths requires fighting through or ignoring childish adults.
A real bomb shell would be the debris left after an explosion, just as an expended cartridge would prove a shot was fired.
Precious few "bombshells" that I have found. But lots of evidence that this corrupt world is slowly reacting against the authoritarian instincts of some, and towards greater liberty for all. In this I am an optimist. Best wishes.
So by all means let’s mandate these shots with so many unknowns.
Though addressed to another, may I reply?
How one controls words is at play. Definitions in these last two years have been changed to comport with the marketing of mRNA products, and so in calling them "vaccines," the marketing wins.
Additionally, then the use of the word "vaccinate" gathers into itself the notion of efficacy. But the clear reality is that these mRNA products are in the midst of an ongoing phase three clinical trial of officially "experimental" injections.
So there is a world of difference between a simplified "get vaccinated" and a "participate in an ongoing and as yet unproven experiment." And for some, by the coercion of a mandate.
That is a difference worth noting.
Interferon are the "scouts" of the immune system, constantly on the lookout for viral invaders, and then report back to the immune system to send out the killer cells. The pre-activated interferon are mostly in the upper bronchial tubes where children are most likely to be exposed to viruses. I suppose this is nature's way of protecting the very young humans, or else we'd have died out long ago before reaching the age of 10. As children grow older, the "pre-activated" interferon stops.
I think of it this way: it's like the difference between a fire trucks/fires and a police cars/crime.
With a fire truck, it's sitting at the station waiting for a dispatch call. My house might be catching fire, but I'm asleep and don't know it. Smoke may start coming out of a window. Finally, someone sees the smoke and calls 911. It takes 10 minutes for the fire trucks to arrive, and my house may have been burning for five minutes before that.
With police cars, they are constantly patrolling the streets. There may be a report of a burglar in the neighborhood and the police are patrolling the area. They may catch the burglar before he gets to my house, and I would never even have known that there was a burglar near my house.
The police car is like "pre-activated" interferon.
So, this makes me wonder if the vaccine in children is interfering with the "pre-activated" interferon by sending out false virus signals and thus distracting the interferon and preventing it from being on the lookout for real viruses?
-PJ
That certainly isn’t my position. My position is more along the lines of figuring out a way to make bureaucrats liable if they make bad decisions based on obviously cr@ppy data and allowing Doctor’s to fulfill their Oath as well as they can to the best of their abilities using their own professional judgment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.