HCQ appears to be effective for many, including myself. May the odds be ever in your favor with taking a failing experimental treatment that you can’t Socratically answer what do the five year safety trials indicate?
First the hunger games quote is well played — I appreciate that level of discourse.
Secondly the fact is that mRNA platforms have been tested for over a decade. I am ok with people not getting vaccinated — it should be a choice I am comfortable with the data as presented and do not see disproportionate risk. There are a lot of stories told, but in my judgment the risks are outweighed by the benefits
As for treatments, the first monoclonals were used over 30 years ago. The have a safe and long track record. Which is why as a therapeutic I think monoclonals should be what a patient seeks. I am lucky — I can get them quite readily where I am — whatever you may believe about HCQ and ivermectin is fine — there is sufficient literature to support multiple views (with ivermectin having slightly stronger objective data than HCQ). However in all cases, -mabs are superior to either HCQ and Ivermectin which is why I will not use the former two therapies, because I know of a superior and available therapy.
Ka ching