“Safe and effective.”
Safe and effective what? Where does the article state that he had the jab?
If you were intellectually honest instead of being an anti-vaxx propogandist, you would have pointed out that the covid virus, itself, is known to cause significant cardiac issues:
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/covid-19-and-the-heart-what-have-we-learned-2021010621603
https://www.heart.org/en/news/2020/09/03/what-covid-19-is-doing-to-the-heart-even-after-recovery
https://hcahoustonhealthcare.com/blog/entry/heart-problems-after-covid-19-what-we-know-now
If you were intellectually honest instead of being an anti-vaxx propogandist, you would have pointed out that the covid virus, itself, is known to cause significant cardiac issues:
Fair enough.
Now point us to the place in the article where it states that he had Covid.
(If you were intellectually honest yourself you would have agreed that the "vaccine" is known to cause significant cardiac issues.)
Yes, and where does the article state that he hasn’t yielded to the experimental mRNA gene therapy?
And where does the article state that he has ever contracted the CCP* virus?
(*CCP= Chinese Communist Party)
“Safe and effective what? Where does the article state that he had the jab?”
C’mon. Since when does the vax porn cult deal in facts ‘n stuff? Those are irrelevant when there’s a good story going.
Simply posting a 2015 study of annual soccer deaths without comment triggered one of them. I guess he’s afraid that it might cut the legs out from underneath the fear porn. Imagine that.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25289716/
“Mortality in international professional football (soccer): a descriptive study”
Alright, alright. It’s MOSTLY safe and effective.
Does it cause heart problems in the vaccinated?