Not likely to walk back there is now plenty of quantified serological testing to prove that antibodies from a 90 day or recent infection have a high enough titer level to prevent reinfection with the same variant. Outside 90 days the levels in the majority of people drop below the critical threshold for infection. This is why the time limit of 90 days. People who have had covid and gotten the vaccines have 100 to 1000 times the antibodies titers of those who just recovered from infection again there are dozens of peer reviewed data sets to back those numbers up with tens of thousands in the N values of those studies. The Lancet has at least half a dozen up for review for those with the reading comprehension skills to understand what the science is showing.
What is the critical threshold? For example, the Labcorp antibody test has a scale of < 0.8 u/mL as negative > 0.8 to 2500+ as positive for antibodies. But nobody seems to say what the minimum threshold is and, in fact, the CDC discourages people from checking their own antibody level in fear that individuals will not take a vaccine. It's insane that anybody was ever injected with a vaccine before their antibody levels were checked and logged. This would've provided a treasure trove of data as outcomes were followed up on. If they had this data they could give guidance such as ">1000 u/mL" is considered sufficient and no vaccine or booster is needed. Instead, they promote this ridiculous policy of constant boosters (which are variants behind) and haven't pushed for therapeutics at all (and in fact are withholding some).
Your weird writing style aside (though it looks like bad machine prose), I’d say... so what? I’d still rather kill someone than take what they are pretending is a “vaccine”. Do you support Americans in that?
But I recall reading somewhere that because of T-cell and B-cell activity, the natural immunity from recovery is broader and deeper than the vax and up to 17 (?) times more durable.