Posted on 01/10/2022 7:48:04 AM PST by COBOL2Java
These little wheelguns pack more punch than .22 LR pistols. But is it enough to get the job done?
The Smith & Wesson 351 PD Airlite shown with a smooth rosewood compact grip
But the most common concealed-carry handguns made for this round are short-barrel, double-action revolvers. This year Taurus USA re-launched the previously discontinued 8-shot Model 942. This snubnose revolver series includes all-steel and aluminum-frame models chambered in .22 LR and .22 Mag. But Taurus is not the only option available. Smith & Wesson's 7-shot 351 PD Airlite J-Frame has been a steady seller for several years. Ruger offers the 6-shot, polymer-framed LCR with a concealed hammer or the LCRx with an exposed hammer that can be manually cocked for single-action fire. Like the Taurus models, the Charter Arms Pathfinder series includes steel or aluminum frames. Perhaps the most unusual .22 Mag revolver currently available is Standard Manufacturing's S333 Thunderstruck. This double-barrel handgun fires two rounds out of its 8-shot cylinder with each pull of the trigger.
Ruger’s lightweight LCR has a frame made of aluminum and polymer
At first glance the .22 Mag. cartridge looks like a stretched version of the .22 LR., but that's not actually the case. It's a much newer cartridge that was introduced by Winchester in 1959 as an upgrade to the older .22 Winchester Rimfire (WRF) cartridge. The .22 Magnum has a longer case, thicker case walls, and an ever so slightly larger bullet diameter. While .22 Mag. is less expensive than most center-fire pistol ammunition, it costs noticeably more than .22 LR. In most cases, the cost of .22 Mag. ammunition rests somewhere in between that of .22 LR and semi-automatic pistol cartridges.
One advantage that shouldn’t be overlooked is the fact that these snubnose revolvers are built using the same frames, barrels and grips as their respective company’s .38 Spl. models. As a result, a wide variety of holsters is readily available and easy to find, like the Galco Scout 3.0 holster shown here.
Stick with 40 grain or heavier bullets for the best performance with snubnose revolver How does the performance of .22 Mag. revolvers measure up to other concealed-carry options? Like other short barrel handguns, it produces solid defensive accuracy at ranges of 7 to 10 yards. The following list shows the muzzle energy ranges for the Ruger LCR and the Taurus 942 along with test results for two .22 LR pistols. I've also included short barrel center-fired pistol and revolver results for comparison:
.22 WMR: | 1.87" Barrel = 113 to 126 ft.-lbs. | (Ruger LCR Revolver) |
.22 WMR: | 2.00" Barrel = 98 to 116 ft.-lbs. | (Taurus 942 Revolver) |
.22 LR: | 2.00" Barrel = 67 to 75 ft.-lbs. | (Ruger LCP II Lite Rack Pistol) |
.22 LR: | 4.00" Barrel = 79 to 113 ft.-lbs. | (Taurus TX22 Pistol) |
.380 ACP: | 2.50" Barrel = 163 to 174 ft.-lbs. | (NAA Guardian Pistol) |
9 mm: | 3.20" Barrel = 277 to 300 ft.-lbs. | (Taurus G3C) |
.38 Spl: | 2.00" Barrel = 296 ft.-lbs. | (Ruger SP101) |
That being said, the .22 Mag. is still a .22-cal. rimfire cartridge. Statically speaking it’s more likely to fail to fire than a center-fire round. Although its performance can sneak up into the .32 ACP pocket pistol ranges, it simply can't compete with the performance of a .380 ACP pistol or a snubnose revolver loaded with reduced recoil .38 Spl. loads.
The Taurus 942 all-stainless steel version
“We have all probably had .22 misfires”
My point is that I can’t recall having one - and in my youth, I fired at least 10,000 rounds thru my S&W 22LR. My revolver and my derringer both probably have a much harder hammer strike than many automatics would give. In any case, I can’t remember having a 22LR ammo failure with my revolver. I may have had one or two many years ago but it certainly is very rare.
I typically shoot around 100 rounds thru my 22 on the rare days I go to the range now and it has been a LONG time since an ammo failure. That experience has no relation to what happens when I try shooting 22LR in a semi-auto!
Any gun is better than no gun.
Better than being unarmed but I wouldn't buy one for self-defense when there are better options out there in small concealed carry pistols.
I had a NAA .22/.22Mag swappable cylinder revolver for awhile. Tiny, super hideable, and with the .22Mag, LOUD! And 2 foot flame. It would scare anyone around when it went off.
Turns out, you can fan the hammer. Yes, it will take skin off. It’s a belly gun, and if you have to use it, use it from 7 feet or less, fan it, don’t extend uour arms much, dump 4 of the 5 into said bad guy.
Boot gun. Last resort.
Revolvers are 19th century anachronisms that belong in a museum, not on your hip.
you carry it?
The report and flame would certainly add to the deterrent effect.
My brother got a p365 and when he first was using it he had a number of failures. It was mostly operator error but I was sure glad my last purchase was the Kimber revolver. Neuropathy makes some aspects of pistol operation less reliable for me.
I have not yet tried the 9mm EZ but I’m retired and don’t need too many more weapons on a fixed income.
Given modern chemistry, ballistics research, etc. Why don’t we have a nice 22LR+P.that has performance approaching 223/5.56?
I have a airlite 317 that frequently failed to fire.
Found out it was a combo ammo choice and the chamber needed to be replaced by S&W.
Only thing it fires is Agulla and federal copper 22’s with decent reliability. CCI had the most issues. funny the 10/22 handles the CCI the best with issues with the above two ammos.
“Why don’t we have a nice 22LR+P.that has performance approaching 223/5.56?”
It is called 22-250.
I remember a case where the cops put a 9 mill slug in the head of a guy who was charging them. He was on bath salts.
Still didn’t stop him. took a few more shots before he dropped.
If that's what you wish to believe, well, believe on!
This article doesn’t talk about cost & availability of ammunition. That could be a major consideration in purchasing options and in training.
One thing I’d like to look at is adding a laser sight. Using the same ammo, whether a 2” gun with a laser has the same accuracy as a 4” gun without one. I believe a laser is worth about 2” worth of gun barrel length for accuracy [but extra length does add ft/lbs of power].
“If that’s what you wish to believe, well, believe on!”
“On the other hand, the “hottest” .45 Colt load, aimed to the chest or gut, may still allow the assailant to cause some serious damage before falling into the dust.”
https://truewestmagazine.com/the-myth-of-the-single-shot-kill/
Sorry I didn’t make myself clear. I’m talking about a bullet that actually fits in any 22LR gun, using the standard case and dimensions.
“Sorry I didn’t make myself clear. I’m talking about a bullet that actually fits in any 22LR gun, using the standard case and dimensions.”
That would be stupidly dangerous!
Fricken hilareous. Love Burr. Helicopter deal made me chit my pants.
Just choot’em in da leg Ole!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.