Comirnaty is being advertised in the USA by name.
Whether or not the vaccine is actually being drawn from a vial with the Comirnaty label is unknown.
The FDA has asserted that the original Pfizer vaccine and Comirnaty are "interchangeable" - so, it is possible that health providers are still under a legal shield, no matter how the vaccine is labeled.
The author also does not understand that the USA is currently under a Health Emergency, declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, which I believe expires in about two weeks.
Under a Health Emergency, all medications and procedures are exempt from civil lawsuits if they have been approved by the relevant medical authorities.
As to the Health Emergency, I think we can be certain that the current media hysteria about Omicron is meant to force Congress to automatically extend the Health Emergency and its lawsuit immunity.
As to the Health Emergency, I think we can be certain that the current media hysteria about Omicron is meant to force Congress to automatically extend the Health Emergency and its lawsuit immunity.
—
Congress never passed any legislation in the case of the 1st “emergency”. It’s all been thru executive fiat. Much like declaring wars, Congress has abdicated its responsibility to an ever increasing autocratic control of the Executive branch.
The author also claims that the vaccine manufacturers would not be protected from civil liability if the EUA ended. This is factually incorrect. The vaccine manufacturers have this legal protection under any circumstances, but there are two different Federal laws covering “EUA vaccines” and “regular vaccines.”
Vaccine makers are protected from liability by law. They can’t be sued, even if it’s not under EUA.