Posted on 01/05/2022 11:43:55 AM PST by Openurmind
Not to be biased, but I felt I needed to share some first hand knowledge from the last few days regarding the home tests. Two of my daughters are nurses in a major hospital.
Both along with three other nurses they work closely with, and two of their children came down with the dreaded "symptoms". So they all took home tests that showed positive for Covid.
As a work and school requirement for the kids, they all had to take the longer term 48 hr test before they could return to work and school. All tested negative with the second 48 hour test.
That is is 7 and 0 losses for the home test. I would say that is a pretty good first hand observation that the home tests are rigged to show false positives.
Fantastic... :)
I hope the results are good. I’m afraid to use the word positive right now. :)
All part of the $hot $ham.
Positive PCR Test. Is It Really Positive? (Mobeen Syed, MD video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjx3doSskbU
I currently believe that Dr. Chetty is on the right track - clinical outcome (the same concern of Dr. Syed):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7PokX4kz30
Summary of Therapy Adopted by Dr. Chetty:
PDF file: “This one-pager summarizes the therapy adopted by Dr Shankara Chetty, from South Africa, to help prevent COVID-19 from progressing towards severe disease. The document focuses on the 8th day onwards of COVID-19, i.e. the inflammatory phase.” Link:
https://emlct.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/COVID-Rx-4-DR-CHETTY-8th_day_therapy_may_12_2021.pdf
Cool.
Best of luck with understanding FACT in da future.
TTFN
OK... Home test right, hospitals wrong...
There is no lack of logic in this for you???
Tests came off the Air China plane ?
Need you ask more.
The new criteria for a COVID19 patient for the clinical practice to determine the need for an early therapeutic regimen and to decrease mortality [Sept. - Oct. 2021]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377921/
“A new predictive criterion is being proposed for the determination of cytokine storm (CS) in COVID-19 (COVID-CS). It is comprised of results of laboratory that associate the pro-inflammatory status, systemic cell death, multi-organ tissue damage, and pre-renal electrolyte imbalance.”
“The data identifies the patients’ stay in hospitals and their mortality with the relevance of hyper-inflammation and tissue damage during the CS.”
“The criteria can be readily used in clinical practice to determine the need for an early therapeutic regimen, block the hyper-immune response and possibly decrease mortality.”
“It helps to understand the nature of the virus by following a specific criterion to predict the disease. The SARS-CoV-2 tells us in few days what nature has decided for the patient i.e., recovery, death or permanent disability.”
You realize that even with 99.7% survival rate, that means over a million dead Americans if each gets infected once. Not counting repeat infections and more variants.
You also have many more who “survive” but get serious long term damage
The explanation that follows Occham’s Razor is that all the tests were correct. 4 negative, 1 positive. Just another breakthrough case mishandled by the medical authorities.
In this case it was 7-zip as incorrect.
Notably, the last I heard was that 46 million Americans had gotten Covid and were unsymptomatic, raising that there death rate to more like 99.8% or 99.9%.
Also, lotsa recordings of people dying FROM this disease when in reality they died when they HAD this disease alongside other major problems, like Herman Cain.
That is NOT a pandemic. It’s a terrible disease, worthy of paying special attention to those with comorbidities such as being real fat, being old, immunocompromised. But not worthy of disrupting the entire country over, because it is NOT a pandemic.
That’s the weird thing about Occham’s Razor. It does not account for imposing your own opinion on da facts. As it turns out, very few people actually know how to think inductively.
There are also those who had Covid and died from the “treatment” inflicted on them by the medical community.
They were killed with Remdesivir and venting.
Those murder victims need to be taken out of the stats.
Apparently, it doesn’t change opinion based on in your face facts.
The vaccine did NOT give him Covid.
***Given the casing that is generated by Occham’s Razor, the most likely reality is that all the tests were correct. So you canNOT say so EMPHATICALLY what you just said. It goes against standard inductive reasoning. But I can see through your other postings that you’re no inductive reasoner.
He most likely
***See now, here you are really TRYING to think inductively. The problem is, you’re simply imposing your own viewpoint on the facts. That is the REVERSE of inductive reasoning.
was exposed without knowing it the day before.
***It is a likelihood. The stronger likelihood is that he was exposed to it after those negative tests. A lesser likelihood is that the vaccine killed him. I know this is hard for you, but try to keep up, engage that there inductive thinking cap you’re so desperately trying to fit on.
He had 3 comorbidities.
***Immaterial to the timing of when he got the virus. He seems to have died from Covid, very likely. He also seems to have been vaccinated and then tested negative so it is very likely he was negative for Covid until he tested positive. See how facts work?
The virus took advantage of his health issues, not the vaccine.
***Not material to our discussion, but it was a real nice attempt at deflection. So while I’ve been criticizing your lack of inductive reasoning skills, it shows up that you are engaging in classic fallacies as well. You should take a critical thinking class.
There you go again.
You really do have trouble with knowing the difference between facts and opinion. Well, best of luck with that. TTFN.
Did you see the rational — there is a very specific reason that the knowledge if evolving — it depends on how the test was collected. Please see above.
On December 18th he was admitted to the hospital, and he was put on the ventilator on December 23rd. The doctors are guardedly optimistic since only his lungs seem to be affected at this point. All we can do is pray now.
They live in San Diego and were unvaccinated. I wish I would have known about Ruben’s condition sooner so I could have passed on information to help treat him. However, it’s my husband’s family and they’re not big on communication in general, plus we’re in AZ so we don’t stay in touch as much as we should. It’s just all very sad.
I will keep your BIL and the family and hospital staff in my prayers. My brother had problems with his heart and lungs early on in the hospital visit, then on the 7th day his kidneys started going out. I knew that meant his death was imminent. He wasn’t going to come back, and if he did, he would’ve been a shell of himself. Still, I would’ve loved to have been given an opportunity to visit him. I wish his wife and kids would’ve been allowed to be at his bedside at the very end. That part is my biggest problem with all of it. TPTB have had their way with protocols so that not even on their death beds are loved ones allowed to go visit. Not even for a minute. No matter if they were vaccinated and not testing positive. He had the nurse who was on duty that day hold his hand as he passed from this world into the next. I am grateful for that, but it should have been my SIL there at a minimum.
I took an antibody test in August at our local Fry’s store. It was negative because the test was only valid for an infection 3-4 months prior, according to the pharmacist. I had presumed Covid in March 2020. I’d have to get a blood test ordered by my doctor to check for antibodies from that long ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.