Math includes sales and pricing. He sets the stage to sell more policies at higher prices.
Why cant freerepublic be more skeptical when something seems to support their views.
This guy is not unbiased and his main agenda is to sell insurance at the highest price possible.
He’s not entitled to his own facts.
Moreover, the statistical observation he has made would need to be supported 100% by the facts.
Bias would not appear to enter into it.
This is an ex-parrot.
Of course the companies all sell coverage to big buyers.
But life insurance is an actuarial game. All numbers and risk
And, that is why I’m waiting for others to confirm it, refute it, or push for more data.
If it is true, others will enter the fray and support it.
Sort of like...REAL science.