6 important COVID data points that destroy the prevailing narrative

“When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health, that of the family, but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community. And in other words, you become a dead end to the virus.” ~Dr. Fauci, Face the Nation, May 16, 2021

“Negative efficacy.” Get used to that term, because every day more data suggests we are already in the vaccination twilight zone of all pain and no gain – just as with the lockdowns.

It is tearing humanity apart. COVID fascism is the most serious human rights threat we’ve faced in our lifetimes, and the latest science and data demonstrate that it’s all built upon a false premise. While people tuned out the news over the holiday week, many have missed the growing incontrovertible evidence that not only is there risk and zero benefit to taking any of the COVID shots, but there is actually negative efficacy against the virus. In other words, not only does it put you on the hook for known and unknown short-term and long-term injury without stopping COVID, it now actually makes you more vulnerable to COVID.

As you read these latest points, just remember that this is the injection for which police in Europe are now using dogs and batons against those protesting it. All these human rights abuses for a shot that, especially with the new variant, has become moot.

1) 96% of all Omicron cases in Germany among vaccinated: The respected Robert Koch Institute reported last week that among the 4,206 Germans infected with Omicron for whom their vaccination status was known, 95.58% were fully vaccinated. More than a quarter of them had booster shots. Given that the overall background rate for vaccination in Germany is 70%, this means that the shots now have a -87% effectiveness rate against Omicron.

2) Omicron among vaccinated outpacing unvaccinated by 28% in Ontario: The government in Ontario posts continuous data on case rates by vaccination status. The fact that the vaccinated have rapidly overtaken the unvaccinated in new infections demonstrates a clear negative effect of the shots against Omicron.

6) Vaccinated exponentially more likely to get re-infected with COVID: A new preprint study from Bangladesh found that among 404 people re-infected with COVID, having been vaccinated made someone 2.45 times more likely to get re-infected with a mild infection, 16.1 times more likely to get a moderate infection, and 3.9 times more likely to be re-infected severely, relative to someone with prior infection who was not vaccinated. Although overall re-infections were rare, vaccination was a greater risk factor of re-infection that co-morbidities!

Hence, the findings of this first-in-its-kind study harmonize with what a Public Health England survey found in October; namely, that the vaccines seem to erase a degree of N (nucleocapsid) antibodies generated by prior infection in favor of narrower S (spike) antibodies. "Recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination,” stated the week 42 report from the U.K. (p. 23).

This finding also correlates with what researchers from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid found last year – that the second dose of the vaccine “determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response." In that report, researchers already observed that other research has shown "the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19 recovered individuals."

At this point, how is there any benefit, much less a net benefit, from the shots? There are currently 21,000 deaths reported to VAERS, along with 110,000 hospitalizations and over 1 million total adverse events. Most deaths and injuries are never reported to VAERS. Now that the efficacy is, at best, a wash and at worst negative, why are we not discussing the short-term and long-term liabilities of the shots?

Remember, the VAERS numbers don’t even begin to quantify the long-term concerns, such as cancer and auto-immune diseases. A heavily redacted analysis of the Pfizer shot (p. 16) from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Agency (TGA) flatly conceded, “Neither genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies were performed.”

Consider the fact that the CEO of Indiana-based life insurance company OneAmerica, which has been around since 1877, revealed last week that the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old Hoosiers is up 40% from pre-pandemic levels. That is four times above what risk assessors consider catastrophic. Yes, some of this has been due to the virus, but given the age group, OneAmerica CEO Scott Davidson said that most of the claims for deaths being filed are not classified as COVID-19 deaths. Brian Tabor, the president of the Indiana Hospital Association, who spoke at the same news conference as Davidson, said that Indiana hospitals are flooded with patients “with many different conditions.” Any wonder what those ailments are if not COVID itself?

Indeed, those who say the injections are a “medical miracle” are correct, just not in the way they meant it.

“It must be a terrifying revelation to so many sheep: the government cannot protect you, and indeed is more often than not the greater threat”.

In a normal, sane world I would agree with you but at this point, the sheep who hear the facts doubt them or don’t even believe them because it goes against their indoctrinated nature.

But before long the sheep are going to see first hand and personally that they’ve been hoodwinked and they are going to be mad as hell.

Then your statement will be right on.

Where communists went wrong

The first communist revolutions , after coming to power, shot their revolutionists
.

Their useful idiots were untrustworthy and shot.

This created the unintended consequence of establishing an historical fact and thus became a detriment to future attempted revolutions.

I guess they thought their current revolution would succeed in global rule. Otherwise they would have foreseen creating this detriment.

That is where the communists went wrong.

They have found a way to circumvent this detriment.

Bioweapons, Mass psychosis and fraudici vaccinations.

They created the external threat of pandemic , then stampeded the useful idiot portion of the human herd that didn’t die of the bioweapon part 1 into the bioweapon 2 , the vaccinations .

Now, instead of eliminating the useful idiots after the revolution with lead shots, they have the surviving useful idiots eliminating them selves during the revolution with a vaccination shot.

Highly ironic and highly effective.
Highly evil.

They aim to win this time aroun

The so-called vaccines are proving to be worse than worthless, they are actually detrimental to your health.

Apparently the various "vaccines" and boosters make you more likely to catch Omicron, which isn't all bad - you might actually get a modicum of natural immunity from it if the vaccines have not damaged your immune system.

However, now the vaccinated are requiring hospitalizations at rates in excess of the local vaccination rates. This means the vaccinated are more likely than the un-vaccinated to require hospitalization. Now maybe this is because the most at-risk people jumped on the vaccination bandwagon, while the less at risk refrained... There's not enough information to know. But on the surface, it looks bad.

I don't want anyone pushing me to get a vaccine, so I will return the courtesy and not push anyone to avoid it. I would advise anyone on the fence about a vaccine or booster to get all the information they can - from as many and varied sources as they can. (not just US sources either, our media is just about universally corrupted)

Daniel Horowitz on twitter May 20, 2020

” infectious disease doctors in Canada estimate that the individual rate of death from COVID for people under 65 is 6/million people, or 0.0006 per cent – 1 in 166,666, which is “roughly equivalent to the risk of dying from a motor vehicle accident during the same time period.”

https://twitter.com/rmconservative/status/1263905664482631683

Daniel Horowitz 1-3-2022

“In other words, not only does it put you on the hook for known and unknown short-term and long-term injury without stopping COVID, it now actually makes you more vulnerable to COVID.”

Hey Daniel Horowitz, since you think Covid is lower risk than a car accident, why do you care if the vaccines are not effective against it?
MORON

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.