[Caipirabob]

His premise is incorrect; it is not one paper. It is multiple papers from various states and various hospitals.

And the results are consistent.

As they say, one is entitled to their own opinion but not facts. Many of these documents have been shared at FR.

I like Kirsch, but this commentary is revealing…

[SoConPubbie]

His premise is incorrect; it is not one paper. It is multiple papers from various states and various hospitals.

And yet you skipped right over this part:

It is well established in many papers that previous infection is way way better than vaccination. Also, the previously infected don’t spread the virus, unlike the vaccinated. So natural infection is also preferred to vaccination.

Furthermore, those "multiple papers from various states and various hospitals" are the same hospitals being incentivized (PAID) to declare COVID cases and deaths by the CARES act.

So, who you going to be believe? The corrupt hospitals?

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The misinformation from the CDC keep on coming, Caipirabob wrote:

His premise is incorrect; it is not one paper. It is multiple papers from various states and various hospitals.

And the results are consistent.

As they say, one is entitled to their own opinion but not facts. Many of these documents have been shared at FR.

I like Kirsch, but this commentary is revealing…

 

---

ransomnote: The study is flat out propaganda and they are suing the CDC as a result. Is it really necessary to undermine one of the few people willing to fight for us?

Here's an excerpt of the lawsuit; please explain how the critique of the comparison under section A below is incorrect.

[Dartoid]

What a moron