‘Science is flawed’: COVID-19, ivermectin, and beyond
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/science-is-flawed-covid-19-ivermectin-and-beyond
The clinical study was entirely fabricated and later withdrawn from the preprint server, subsequent to great scandal.
The ivermectin story somehow got even worse from there. In late 2020, studies started popping up showing what can only be described as simply incredible results for the medication — a 90% mortality benefit or a 100% reduction in cases when used as a prophylactic.
After nearly a year, myself and other data sleuths demonstrated that many of these studies probably never happened, but the damage was well and truly done long before the first fake paper was retracted.
A meta-analysis of ivermectin, which is usually considered the gold standard of research practices, found a huge benefit for the drug. However, the paper has not been corrected, even though the studies underlying its results were found to be likely fraudulent.
Lol, z paper written by an Aussie, th3 land of covid camps and human rights violations 8n the name of health,, finds ivermectin study Fraudulent? Lol alrighty then.
‘Likely didn’t happen”? Either there is evidence that it didn’t happen or was Fraudulent, or there isnt- which is it? Is there evidence that the MetaStudy was Fraudulent or not?
[[After nearly a year, myself and other data sleuths demonstrated that many of these studies probably never happened, ]]
“Probably never happened”? Seriously? And we are to take his questionable analysis of the study as gospel truth over the actual studies findings why? He is attempting to malign the study but can’t use any definitive and has to resort,to “probably never happened” in order to do so? And all this after his “careful analysis”? Lol
As I mentioned in previous,posts, there has been a massive gov and liberal effort to malign Ivermectin, z d folks like the link you posted to are part of,it. He gives no valid reason why ivermectin should not be used along with other medications, and js tead points to one study, run by pro vaccine folks no doubt, that state that it should,not be used except in c,inical trials
He gives no valid reason why it shouldn’t- typical of all the propaganda agaisnt ivermectin and hcq.
He makes a bold,statement that the meta ana,analysis, was “fraudulent” and his only proof is that he THINKS it “COULD HAVE BEEN”?
WOW. alright then