Posted on 12/29/2021 7:31:32 PM PST by Kevmo
Collis - Exotic Neutral Particles as a comprehensive explanation for CMNS
Bill Collis, billcollis (at) iscmns.org
This paper explains anomalies in hydrogen loaded metals in terms of catalytic neutron transfer by Exotic Neutral Particles (ENPs) by making radical innovations to the models of Bazhutov and Fisher, simplifying their assumptions while simultaneously improving the match with observation. It is shown how penetrating radiation is rarely produced and evidence is offered showing new interpretations of Q/4He, tritium and neutrons.
Excess heat production without penetrating radiation is explained in the Ni/H, Ti/D, Pd/D, Li2SO4. Conversely observed radiation from Cl and Rb is explained.
Keywords: Empirical observations, Heat–He correlation, Exotic Neutral Particles
References 1. W.J.Huang, G.Audi, M.Wang, F.G.Kondev, S.Naimi and X.Xu, "The Ame2016 atomic mass evaluation" Chinese Physics C41 030002, March 2017
2. W.J.Huang, M.Wang, F.G.Kondev, G.Audi and S.Naimi , The Ame2020 atomic mass evaluation Chinese Physics C45, 030002, March 2021.
3. Collis W; “ENSAP Software Tool To Analyse Nuclear Reactions” in The Seventh International Conference on Cold Fusion. 1998. Vancouver, Canada: ENECO, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT. (www.iscmns.org/software/ENSAP/ensap.htm )
4. Fisher J.C., Polyneutrons as agents for cold nuclear reactions. Fusion Technol., 1992. 22: p. 511.
5. Bazhutov Y., Vereshkov G. A Model of Cold Nuclear Transmutation by the Erzion Catalysis (The Erzion Model of 'Cold Fusion'), Proc. ICCF4 4, (1993), p 99 www.lenrcanr.org/acrobat/EPRIproceedingc.pdf
6. Hagelstein P., Kaushik S. Neutron Transfer Reactions, Proc. ICCF4 1, (1993), p 221 www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EPRIproceeding.pdf
7. Bush R., Eagleton R. Evidence for Electrolytically Induced Transmutation and Radioactivity Correlated with Excess Heat in Electrolytic Cells With Light Water Rubidium Salt Electrolytes, Proc. ICCF4 3, (1993), p 27 www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EPRIproceedingb.pdf
8. Miles, M. and Bush B.F., Radiation Measurements at China Lake: Real or Artifacts? in The Seventh International Conference on Cold Fusion. 1998. Vancouver, Canada: ENECO, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT. www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesMradiationm.pdf
9. A. Christian Tahan, System for Generating Particles, United States Patent Application, US 2014/0119487 A1 https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/14840-us20140119487a1-pdf/
-------------------------------------------------------
Collis – A critical look at some CMNS Models
William Collis billcollis (at) iscmns org
This paper will compare the predictions made by theory against experimental observations. The comparison will include expected interactions of naturally occurring stable isotopes. The concepts considered will include:-
1. Overcoming a Coulomb barrier
2. Electron capture and fusion
3. Fusion of multiple deuterons
4. Deep Dirac Levels
5. Widom Larsen heavy electrons
6. Polyneutron theory
7. Erzion theory
In addition we discuss common constraints that apply to all CMNS models. It is shown that there is no “Cold Fusion” because the expected products of Coulomb barrier penetration are not observed.
W. Collis 'Exotic Neutral Particles as an explanation for CMNS' 43 minutes
Collis – A critical look at some CMNS Models. Starting at 1:06
The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science
—
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Acronyms:
LENR: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. [Also Lattice Enabled Nuclear Reactions, but seldom used]
CANR: Chemical Assisted Nuclear Reactions [fallen into disuse along with LANR/Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reactions]
CMNS: Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
LCF: Lattice Confined Fusion [NASA’s term for it]
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson
The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Such FReepers who persist in polluting these threads have been asked to leave, and we are asking that they open their own threads if they have comments.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3977426/posts?page=19#19
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented.
Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.
Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.
19 posted on 7/19/2021, 6:45:09 PM by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse]
“
Hydrogen is now considered as a future major vector of energy. Hydrogen can be produced
without consumption of fossil fuels by electrolysis provided the electricity is generated by green
energies. “
So we need solar cells and windmills?
Lurkers will note that TG has been seagulling on these LENR threads and has been asked multiple times to leave.
Even in this instance, he quotes from a completely different presentation in the conference. His goal is to disrupt rather than to further the science.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.