And then add your biting commentary. "First mistake" indeed.
Pardon if I'm a bit sensitive, but your 'fact-checking' source hails from the same camp which censored me and continues to do so.
In short, if your intent was to highlight the affronts of those who create & parrot abject lies, your post was LAZY.
Aside from the obvious question of "Why?" Breitbart is running AP material, the larger question is why pro 'vaccine' FReepers seem so keen to supporting the stifling of the flow of information.
There is no question our enemies are fomenting divisions among us - including our own government - but your premise in defense of a 'safe/effective vaccine' is egregiously flawed when the evidence is viewed logically & pragmatically.
The fact remains that the establishment has been forced to acknowledge - despite prior denials and labeling of misinformation itself - the very real risk of myocarditis. Furthermore, the medical evidence of the effect upon the heart muscle has been incontrovertibly documented.
In an environment where young & healthy children/young adults with little-to-no risk of severe illness are being compelled to get the vaccine, it requires suspension of disbelief that athletes - who harbor a higher risk of heart problems as it is, for reasons I'm not going into here - wouldn't be at greater risk of cardiac arrest resulting from 'vaccine' induced damage to the heart muscle.
Your post is egregiously deceptive and, notably, manipulative, considering your comment "Get Vaccinated if you want, or don’t if you prefer" in a post about athletes, many of whom have NO CHOICE but to get jabbed under unrelenting pressure, coercion and restricted information.
My retort - FAR from being a 'fact-check' - is merely to provide the information you - and the biased source - lazily omitted:
For the record, the link to the offending video (which neither you, Brietbart or AP had the balls to post):
WHY ARE HEALTHY ATHLETES COLLAPSING?
And also for the record, the facts on Jake West, which took me a whopping 15 seconds to fact check for myself without a flipping AP pro ‘vaccine’ article
3 high school athletes died of sudden cardiac arrest. Their moms are fighting back.
Yes, “PRO VACCINE”:
“A rare risk of myocarditis, a condition that causes inflammation of the heart and tends to occur mostly in young men and teen boys, has been associated with the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. Those affected usually recover quickly, however, and health officials have concluded that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks.”
And so let’s have a debate about it, right?
382 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 220 Dead, After COVID Shot
“My company has been studying these kinds of cases (see list below) in which young, fit athletes have cardiac-related death or collapse, often right on the field. There have been many more of these incidents in 2021. I assigned one of our CIA-trained analysts to conduct a random sampling to confirm these events below are real. His reply:
“I reviewed the list, and specifically conducted research on some instances listed, drawing on each month. All of the news stories I reviewed appeared authentic. I also found additional news stories on these cases reported by other outlets. That further corroborated many of the stories.”
367 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 209 Dead, After COVID Shot/By goodsciencing.com
I’m all for having a debate, but prefacing it with information from clearly biased sources outlining a one-sided argument which ignores the glaring lack of attention on the part of the media – coupled with clear efforts by the establishment to limit access to actual data – is hardly a template for open debate.
Give me ALL information; I’ll make up my own mind.
As for the wide swath of vulnerable idiots who are still compelled to believe everything that they see/hear without expending an iota of time to validate for themselves, good luck protecting them…
…BUT DO NOT PROFESS TO DO SO AT THE EXPENSE OF MY RIGHT TO ALL AVAILABLE FACTS FREE OF GOVERNMENT & MEDIA BIAS/MISINFORMATION/PROPAGANDA.
As stated, the question on Brietbart's bias in this respect is another matter.
You commented, "Now Breitbart is Leftist?" Well, yes...to those with open eyes. They certainly have a bias. This article is evidence to that statement. As for your motivation, it's clear to me that you're playing a game. Fine. Drinking & posting? A bit of a superiority complex? I'm not the only one wondering about your motivations.
I scanned your post history of articles since August: NOT A ONE about media bias, but most of the rest speak volumes to motive behind what is clearly projection.
It would be one thing to post a Conservative source on internet misinformation pursuant to truth & facts, but all you did is publish an admittedly reprinted article from a source which is lock, stock & barrel vested in seeing everyone jabbed, damned be the facts, choice or informed consent.
And then you doubled down on it, feigning 'no bias' while promoting wholly-biased media garbage with manipulating opinion.
Absolutely shameful.
