Posted on 12/20/2021 6:08:40 PM PST by Entrepreneur
Now, the Fauci Emails reveal that Dr Anthony Fauci was the one who threatened the Indian scientists and forced them to withdraw their study. We also know the article was pulled back after members of the medical community launched a campaign to withdraw that study, which no doubt included Dr. Fauci himself!
(Excerpt) Read more at civilianintelligencenetwork.ca ...
If he works for the U.S. Government, he’s going to have a hard time getting a patent on anything, especially something he works on as part of his job.
It’s the truth. Fay I should be hung right next to Gates.
Sounds loopy.
All depends on his contract. SES employees are not like the rest of us peons.
His MO is invent disease and unleash it on the world. Certain he created HIV AIDS too.
Usually true. This situation with Fauci is more complex than that. He has worked it out so he gets a piece of the action.
Well, I have treated more than a thousand patients with HIV and lots and lots of COVID patients since March 2020.
The two viruses, other than both being RNA viruses, are not similar, and they cause very different diseases.
The question is did the Chinese splice in an hiv gene into a coronavirus in their gain of function research that Fauci funded.
Is that gof coronavirus sars cov2 , or is it another virus?
back in around 2002 Art Bell had a female doctor who was x? military trying to stop the military from forcing Anthrax Vax on everyone.
She said that she had previously worked researching HIV and that Fauci had called her and made a bunch of demands that she turn over research to him and she told him to stuff it up his donkey, but he went over her head and got her fired.
Remembering that makes this article sound somewhat possible.
bttt
Keep sticking your head in the sand, or do some research before you assume you know what’s going on:
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/anthony-s-fauci
Read Robert F. Kennedy’s book if you want additional insight into this weasel’s depravity and avarice.
There was a paper from India in February 2020 that claimed that a piece of the HIV gp120 envelope protein was present in SARS CoV 2.
gp120 is the target for HIV antibody tests, COVID patients are not HIV+ (unless they were HIV+ already), and the Indian paper was retracted for revisions and has not reappeared.
Glycoprotein 120 is found in a number of viruses, including dengue fever, ebola ... and yes, HIV. It does not mean “Covid is HIV/AIDS”. Nor is it dengue or ebola.
My verdict: tinfoil beanie needed.
The government can own the patents AND the director of the institute, can divy up the reward as he sees fit. I would love to see Fauci’s tax records.
The point is…. WHO forced the paper’s retraction??? Zerohedge was demonetized for a while for reporting on it, as I recall.
Do you think it was retracted because it was untrue, or because of political pressure? Furthermore, if you want to claim to be a physician with clinical experience, I respectfully ask you to provide evidence of your credentials.
Isn’t that what is referenced I the article?
Since all these variants are sequenced, is the paper shown to be completely erroneous?
Tia
out of curiosity, do you know how much Fauci was involved in Ebola ?
https://www.science.org/content/article/why-nihs-anthony-fauci-treating-ebola-patients-himself
just a random article or 2
While you are correct when you say covid is not HIV/AIDS Or dengue or ebola.
This does not mean Fauci has not been stirring the viri Pie a little bit
Put that virus back where it came from or so help me.
Put that vaccine back where it came from or so help me.
Meanwhile, Trump against vaccine mandates, but Trump against questioning vaccines.
I don’t chew my cabbage twice.
Here is the Sars Cov 1 Patent process 7220852. They read like someone is building car parts.
Fauci mengela patent
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.