Posted on 12/20/2021 6:08:40 PM PST by Entrepreneur
Now, the Fauci Emails reveal that Dr Anthony Fauci was the one who threatened the Indian scientists and forced them to withdraw their study. We also know the article was pulled back after members of the medical community launched a campaign to withdraw that study, which no doubt included Dr. Fauci himself!
(Excerpt) Read more at civilianintelligencenetwork.ca ...
Yes, they are being developed for hiv as well.
I am on record saying mRna therapy may end up being one of the greatest medical advance in history, or it may not.
I guess time will tell.
Until then I prefer to be part of the control group
The retrovirus, Equine Infectious Anemia, can be transmitted by a vector if the vector transmits fluid from the infected to an uninfected within three to five minutes. The HIV virus is just as labile but why can’t HIV be transmitted the same by a vector? Contaminated needles transmit the disease in humans so why not a vector? This aspect of retrovirus transmission has always seem to be a paradox with the HIV.
I won’t pretend to be an expert in this field, but I’ve suspected for some time they’ve been lying, starting way back when they pressured those Indian scientists to withdraw their study about HIV insertions into the virus. And most of the experts in that field seem to be thinking along the same lines. It’s amazing to me that science has become so corrupted, I use to hold these folks in the highest esteem
Interesting link, although he has missed a few things..
There is evidence of sickness before December in Wuhan, based on satellite photos of hospital parking lots.
Also in China corona viri were mostly considered mostly harmless and studied in level 2 and 3 labs one of which is a few hundred meters from the wet market.
Now we know why the bastards been pushing these covid-19 poisons he calls a vaccine.
I want to know why he owns the patents and not the American People.the American Taxpayers funded the SOB’s research.
Where is the FBI’s investigation into this felony case of diversion? Also known as fraud.
Over my many years I've built up some good direct and indirect contacts in "high places".
When this virus first hit the US I received a call from "someone who knew someone" in a special laboratory that had already sequenced the virus. The person on that call told me that it had already been determined that the virus was man-made, and that it did incorporate the HIV virus.
But it doesn’t incorporate the HIV virus. There is a small section in the genetic code which is common with the HIV virus and many other viruses including plant viruses. Nothing special at all; very ordinary.
Thank you for that additional info. As I am recovering from COVID.delta myself, I feel a little better. :)
I don’t pretend to be an expert, either. But with GoF research on those bat viruses being conducted in that leaky lab in Wuhan, plus all the indications pointed out in the piece I posted the link to, and Occam’s Razor...
Speaking of Ocean’s razor, it comes down on the side of accidental leak, not intentional release by the Chinese government. That does not mean elements of the CCP regime were not interested in such research for purposes of biowarfare, of course.
I, too, am saddened by the corruption of science. My father was a brilliant scientist who did much to better our world. He was also a great comfort to me back when they were trying to scare us kids at school with with “science” like global cooling (”we’re all gonna freeze”), population bomb (”we’re all gonna starve”), etc. back in the day. Now it’s “climate change”.
I hope the truth about the origin of Covid comes out eventually. Scientists involved in such GoF research to begin with were well-intentioned, believing they were possibly preparing to save many lives. There’s also a flip side to mucking about with this stuff, and we’re living it (while many have died from it). The dirty hands involved are not all Chinese. We’ll likely have a long period of the origin being “contended” and “controversial”.
The lessons we ought to be learning from this mess are not being discussed. Things like the wisdom of sharing our technology with China. The wisdom of allowing such GoF research to be conducted in such lab conditions as at Wuhan. The wisdom of allowing ourselves to be dependent on China for essential goods (pharmaceuticals, for example). The wisdom of our sharing dual-use technologies with China. This really should be a wake-up call.
Instead, we’re carrying on about nonsense like supposed teeny tiny razor blades in vaccines and “Covid is HIV” and “the vaccines give you AIDS”.
It’s just another idiotic conspiracy theory. Something that has gotten all too popular at FR.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797543/table/T1/?report=objectonly
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797543/
Fauci the fraud also has a patent for...Remdesivir.
This source is such an exaggeration, with so many errors, that I can only believe the site is set up to lure the gullible and try to delegitimize our side and the actual legit experts speaking out on our side.
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/anthony-s-fauci
Fauci does own many patents.
But the source of this article is not credible.
That is a difficult question to answer for the general American population because we specifically test symptomatic people.
I work for an organization that requires asymptomatic testing for travel, their testing is lumped in with general testing with that and post exposure testing, we see about 10 to 15 percent asymptomatic positives.
I have seen studies that indicate 40 percent of cases are asymptomatic but if there is no test, it doesn’t get reported as a positive.
My understanding is that the Indian paper was withdrawn based on political pressure, not a scientific refutation.
Thanks for your reply. I have been confused since the beginning. Once exposed, everyone runs out and gets tested (me included), whether we have symptoms or not. If that test is SARS-COV2 (virus) positive, the person is counted as “Covid” (disease) positive. However, everyone who tests positive for HIV is not counted as having AIDS. I suppose strict precautions after a positive test, in either case, are the same, and that is what matters. Just wondering if the Positive numbers might be inflated. Thanks again for replying.
bttt
My source of info was more “spooky”. Very spooky, and very credible. However, I may have misinterpreted what they said about the HIV characteristic.
I think that initial spooky determination is correct, and has been corroborated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.