Replies

132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection.

How many versions of this lie are you going to post?

"When viewing the vaccine analysis print you should remember that: * reporters are asked to submit Yellow Card reports even if they only have a suspicion that the medicine or vaccine may have caused the adverse reaction. The existence of an adverse reaction report in the print does not necessarily mean that the vaccine has caused the suspected reaction. * It may be difficult to tell the difference between something that has occurred naturally and a suspected adverse reaction. Sometimes these events can be part of the condition being treated rather than being caused by the vaccine. * many factors have to be considered when assessing whether the vaccine has caused a reported adverse reaction. When monitoring the safety of vaccines and medicines, MHRA staff carry out careful analysis of these factors."

These lies about adverse events are getting tiresome.

Can't you post some lies about getting AIDS from the vaccines?

These lies about adverse events are getting tiresome. Can't you post some lies about getting AIDS from the vaccines?

...........

Well that settles it, I guess everyone having adverse reactions are lying, even if it is documented. Yup, your very clever.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, semimojo wrote:

132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection.

How many versions of this lie are you going to post?

"When viewing the vaccine analysis print you should remember that: * reporters are asked to submit Yellow Card reports even if they only have a suspicion that the medicine or vaccine may have caused the adverse reaction. The existence of an adverse reaction report in the print does not necessarily mean that the vaccine has caused the suspected reaction. * It may be difficult to tell the difference between something that has occurred naturally and a suspected adverse reaction. Sometimes these events can be part of the condition being treated rather than being caused by the vaccine. * many factors have to be considered when assessing whether the vaccine has caused a reported adverse reaction. When monitoring the safety of vaccines and medicines, MHRA staff carry out careful analysis of these factors."

These lies about adverse events are getting tiresome.

Can't you post some lies about getting AIDS from the vaccines?

So all this time your problem is you don't know what a safety signal is? Look it up - it doesn't mean every case is directly related. It means if unusual numbers show up, like those never seen before (*cough* Covid 'vaccines'*cough*) you respond to the safety signal by pausing and investigating. Instead - the CDC races to get as many people 'vaccinated' as possible, despite violations of human rights, Constitutional rights and the Nuremberg Code, before enough of the truth breaks through the media blackout on such information.

So, you don't know what 'lie' means either? Well now, I guess that explains your posts...

Adverse Ocular Events following COVID-19 Vaccination

Ophthalmological Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Inflammatory Eye Diseases and Autoimmune Disorders

Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy following COVID-19 Vaccination: Consequence or Coincidence

From the article....

Now, “fact-checkers” alongside authorities have been on the case to sweep this data under the carpet and have labelled it as unreliable. Their reasoning is that “just because someone reports the event after having the vaccine, it doesn’t necessarily mean it is due to the vaccine”.

But what they’re not telling you is that it also doesn’t necessarily mean it is not due to the vaccine, and we imagine every single person who has reported an adverse reaction would disagree with the fact checkers and authorities attempts to play down these reports.

Look, they're talking about YOU, banned liberal troll formerly known as Mojo.

#MojoTheFactChecker