Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?

Since the first Covid-19 vaccine was authorised for use in the United Kingdom, and administered on the 8th December 2020, there have been hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. But there is one particular adverse reaction which is both concerning and strange, and the number of people suffering from it is increasing by the week – Blindness.

The MHRA Yellow Card scheme analysis print for the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab shows that since the first jab was administered on the 9th December 2020, and up to December 8th 2021, 132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection. Another 6 people have also reported central vision loss, whilst a further 3 people have reported sudden visual loss.

Fifteen people have also reported an adverse reaction known as ‘blindness transient’ due to the Pfizer vaccine. This is where a person suffers visual disturbance or loss of sight in one eye for seconds or minutes at a time. And a further six people have reported an adverse reaction known as ‘unilateral blindness’. This is where a person is blind or has extremely poor vision in one eye.

In total there have been 6,682 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab as of 8th Dec 21.

The AstraZeneca viral vector injection has also caused hundreds of people to go blind. As of December 8th the MHRA has received 306 reports of blindness, 3 reports of central vision loss, 5 reports of sudden visual loss, and 26 reports of blindness transient among 14,448 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the jab.

The Moderna mRNA injection, which was first administered in June and has the lowest number of injections administered in the UK, has also caused several people to suffer blindness.

As of 8th Dec 21 the MHRA have received 19 reports of blindness, and 34 reports of visual impairment as adverse reactions to the Moderna injection.

In all, when including adverse reactions reported where the brand of vaccine was not specified, there have been 22,060 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, with 461 of these reactions being complete blindness. Now, “fact-checkers” alongside authorities have been on the case to sweep this data under the carpet and have labelled it as unreliable. Their reasoning is that “just because someone reports the event after having the vaccine, it doesn’t necessarily mean it is due to the vaccine”.

But what they’re not telling you is that it also doesn’t necessarily mean it is not due to the vaccine, and we imagine every single person who has reported an adverse reaction would disagree with the fact checkers and authorities attempts to play down these reports.

For instance one person who goes by the name of Louis has been documenting the story of his wife on Twitter since she had the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.

Unfortunately his wife went completely blind in her left eye and 30-60% blind in her right eye after having the AstraZeneca jab and the neurologist treating her, categorically told her not have the second dose.

As you can see the misery which the fact checkers are disregarding as “not necessarily the fault of the vaccine” is very real for the people who are reporting them. But why are the Covid vaccines causing people to go blind?

Well there is another extremely concerning adverse reaction that has been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme, one which has seen an astronomical increase in the number of reports in the past few weeks – stroke.

As of 8th Dec 21, the MHRA has received 652 reports of stroke due to the Pfizer mRNA injection, which is now the primary booster jab being administered to Brits. These reports include 14 reports of subarachnoid haemorrhage, which is an extremely rare type of stroke, 48 reports of cerebral haemorrhage, 55 reports of ischaemic stroke, and 414 reports of cerebrovascular accidents.

Unfortunately the AstraZeneca vaccine has also caused hundred of strokes. Up to 8th Dec 21 the MHRA has received 2,193 reports of stroke as adverse reactions to the jab resulting in 154 deaths. The 2,193 strokes include 180 cerebral haemorrhages, 114 subarachnoid haemorrhages (supposed to be rare), 156 ischaemic strokes, and a shocking 1,275 cerebrovascular accidents.

But what does this have to do with people going blind? Well this helpful fact sheet provided by the Stroke Foundation in Australia provides the answer as to why. According to the fact sheet around one-third of stroke survivors suffer visual loss, and most sadly never fully recover their vision.

The reason strokes cause blindness is that vision depends on a healthy eye to receive information and a healthy brain to process that information. The nerves in the eye travel from the eye through the brain to the occipital cortex at the back of the brain, allowing you to see.

Most strokes affect one side of the brain. Nerves from each eye travel together in the brain, so both eyes are affected. If the right side of your brain is damaged, the left side vision in each eye may be affected. It is rare for both sides of the brain to be affected by stroke. When it does happen, it can result in blindness.

So if you’ve been wondering how on earth the experimental Covid vaccines could cause a person to go blind, you now know why. It’s the vast amount of strokes the Covid injections are causing that is contributing to this devastating and life-changing adverse event. Strokes will not be the only contributing factor of course, but the numbers suggest they are most likely the main adverse reaction at fault.

Ah, wasting more of my time with your stupid contortions again. I'm just supposed to keep circling back every time you lie or dilute with irrelevence?

You distort the safety signal that VAERS has been blaring from the start by implying 10K deaths when a few hundred are normal for the quantity makes perfect sense - "nothing to see here." It's not. Compared with all other vaccines, the Covid 'vaccine' is protected from all accountability no matter how many people it maims and kills.

You're pretending doctors/nurses/staff aren't being punished for reporting to VAERS and insisting that people are OVER Reporting Covid compared with the past. Right. At a time they could lose their jobs, offices, be stripped of their hospital rights, have disciplinary action taking against them you're just going to look right into the camera and say, "nothing to see here, move along!"

Years of Influenza post vax deaths compared with one year of Covid deaths. You see NOTHING! NOTHING AT ALL!

Mortality (openvaers.com)

ransomnote said: What's new and novel is the unprecedented levels of human rights abuses, Constitutional Rights violates, and Communist Regime tactics to force people to get a toxic 'vaccine' they don't need.

semimojo: OK, but that's politics. I'm talking about health data.

You're pretending that Covid is not politicized and politics is not influencing Covid policy, doctors,nurses and their willingness to report to VAERS. Given the CDC/Fauci head the effort to punish those who report to VAERS, I think it's safe to assume they don't check to see if anyone is reporting anything, nor do they punish those who don't know what VAERS is or that their supposed to report to it.

ransomnote: Here you are, carrying water for Fauci and others who want us dead.

semimojo: Right. They want us dead.

Drama Queen much?

China Virus, Wuhan Fauci, China gave us the supposed genome for the 'vaccines', we don't need a vax lockdowns or masks, it's a violation of our Constitutional Rights and the Nuremberg code. When you start connecting the dots, you'll realize that this isn't health policy and the CDC/FAUCI chose lethal treatments for the mandatory Covid Protocol (Remdesivir, MIdazolam, intubation) for a reason, one that you eagerly serve. You do know. YOu're just here to mislead people into toxic injections.

semimojo: It's a safety signal meant to help identify significant risks from the vaccines and to your great consternation it hasn't as of yet.

ransomnote: False. It was identified publicly, on pubic record as having numerous signficant risks. To date, that evidence has not been refuted.

At the FDA ACIP advisory meeting, Steve Kirsch and his team laid down statistics and documented proof the FDA's team could not refute. Let that sink in. At the conclusion of the meeting, thoroughly unable to refute data with which they were confronted, they declined to recommend a booster.

Off record, in private, Walensky reversed the decision - that's what happens when our enemies have towers from which to send forth damaging edicts.

Steve Kirsch and his team have the data and have offered a million dollars in compensation for anyone from the FDA/CDC/Fauci etc. to debate his team but since his team has the facts - the traitors in our government hide in their towers.

ransomnote: ...the safety signal would cause the halting of the program until all safety concerns were thoroughly addressed.

And it will. Your problem is simply that you disagree with the public health professionals.

semimojo. Your problem is simply that you disagree with the public health professionals.

False. You're pretending not to know that the CDC created a safety threshold that is mathmatically impossible to cross. Like the CDC in Fauci, you strategically ignore all the evidence and then prevaricate with gusto.

ransomnote: With 1200 deaths during the Pfizer trial, there was always rock solid evidence to show that Covid 'vaccines' were more deadly than anything else in VAERS.

semimojo: First of all, there were exactly 6 deaths in the Pfizer trial.

"Two BNT162b2 recipients died (one from arteriosclerosis, one from cardiac arrest), as did four placebo recipients (two from unknown causes, one from hemorrhagic stroke, and one from myocardial infarction). No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo."

False. They simply ignored the data, like you do and like the CDC does, the FDA does, the NIH does. You people just pretend you don't know. Pfizer didn't count most of the people who became ill because their invalid PCR test didn't confirm Covid, even though the people were sick. No doubt those unfortunate 1200 were uncounted. CERTAINLY investigators are not going to admit harm related to the vaccine because they have a bio war to conduct, and because the government is liable for the harm the 'vaccine' causes, and Fauci/NIH have a stake in the success of the product.

semimojo: Old, sick people, who were the first to get the vaccine, die fairly frequently. I can't tell from the documents I saw how many doses were administered during that period but I'd expect it was millions. What makes you think 1200 reported deaths over 3 months is unusually high for that population?

The old 'circle of life' argument didn't hold up under analysis. A PHD Statistician demonstrated why that argument doesn't explain the deaths. Your kind all ignore that and go back to pushing the 'narrative'.

ransomnote: The Safety Signal is functioning but the CDC has created a 'safety algorithm' which mathemeticians have proven is impossible to cross.

semimojo: As I've said, I'm not a believer in large conspiracies.

Check out the article posted to FR. INdependent mathmeticians demonstrate, so that others can test it for themselves, that the algorithm the CDC establish a safety threshold can not be crossed.

There is no safety review board. Normally when VAERS cases are reviwed, it's done by a panel announced by name in advance and would have taken months. The CDC just stated one day it had already happened, declined to name the panelists and said they were FDA doctors, except those doctors are not qualified to perform reviews of drug/treatment like those. All standard processes are rubberstamped or ignore, just like evidence, for Covid biowarfare agents known as "vaccines."

The reason you all 'don't know' so much, can't remember it, never saw it, was because you're a)lying and b) too lazy to put much into it. You just 'didn't see it'. It just 'doesn't exist'.

... this isn't health policy and the CDC/FAUCI chose lethal treatments for the mandatory Covid Protocol (Remdesivir, MIdazolam, intubation) for a reason, one that you eagerly serve. You do know. YOu're just here to mislead people into toxic injections.

I don't believe the CDC/Fauci intentionally chose lethal protocols for any reason. I believe if you think that you're being paranoid.

Steve Kirsch and his team laid down statistics and documented proof the FDA's team could not refute

Is it that the FDA couldn't refute it or they recognized it was so loopy with no confirming data that they didn't bother?You're pretending not to know that the CDC created a safety threshold that is mathmatically impossible to cross.?

No pretense. What's this threshold? I've never heard of it.

They simply ignored the data, like you do and like the CDC does, the FDA does, the NIH does. You people just pretend you don't know. Pfizer didn't count most of the people who became ill because their invalid PCR test didn't confirm Covid, even though the people were sick. No doubt those unfortunate 1200 were uncounted.

So you admit that you have zero, that is absolutely no, evidence to back up your claim that 1200 people died during the Pfizer trial.

You just think they blatantly lied and said it was six when it was really 1200.

Think about the implications of that delusion.

The CDC just stated one day it had already happened, declined to name the panelists and said they were FDA doctors, except those doctors are not qualified to perform reviews of drug/treatment like those.

You really believe that?

All along I've thought you were knowingly posting this misinformation to feed the needy skeptics on this forum.

I'm beginning to think you don't even recognize that it's mostly lies.

Either way, you should stop posting junk from these misinformation sites?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.