[FreeReign]

Good question.

An earlier tally from back in April says the following...

"VAERS data released on April 16th showed 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders with 400 attributed to Pfizer, 337 to Moderna and 56 to Johnson & Johnson between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 8, 2021."

April 16th VAERS Data Show Reports of Blood Clotting

[ConjunctionJunction]

Did J&J not grease enough palms compared to the other vaxx makers?

[ThunderSleeps]

Interesting. If you look at the approximate number of people vaccinated by each type then J&J comes out about in the middle:

Pfizer at 2.8 per million vaccinated

J&J at 3.2 per million vaccinated

Moderna at 3.6 per million vaccinated

In that light the J&J doesn't seem to be significantly different than the others. Of course since the mRNA are a two shot series, if you look at it on a per shot risk or rate, then J&J is nearly double the others.

[entropy12]

"VAERS data released on April 16th showed 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders with 400 attributed to Pfizer, 337 to Moderna and 56 to Johnson & Johnson between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 8, 2021."

400+337+56=793 on my $1 calculator. But VAERS says 795?
I guess my cheap calculator must be defective.

From the same calculator, At least 234,269,053 people or 71% of the population have received at least one dose, which calculated risk of blood clots at 793/234,269,053 x 100 = 0.00034%

Nah, that is ridiculously low. Must be my bad calculator from the dollar store. No one would be upset over 0.00034% risk. This calculator needs to be squashed under by boots.