Did anyone ever figure out the significance of Corney vs Comey? Are they hiding something from being searched? Seems a few hundred mentions of Corney and none of Comey (in your links) is rather significant. Was someone else appearing in place of Comey back then?
Just some observations. Of interest is the post where in Dec. 19 Q mentions the 2020 elections were corrupted. Very Nostradomas like.
You are correct. The records had been purged of Comey and actually said Corney, so the references couldn’t be found in a search.
good questions...I don’t recall that was answered.
I have the original and 2 updated revisions.(were there more ? I don’t know).
The 1st 2 versions it’s all corney. The last had 13 “Corney”s and 148 “Comey”s.
Some tried to blame OCR but came up short on that.
The Horowitz report of 06/2018 also had a couple of “Corney”s in it.
and last...”Q” pointed out “James 8. CORNEY” in drop 2943 - march 3, 2019
then calls out “corney” again in drops 3703\3706\3708 Dec 17, 201;
Note: The IG report “Report of Investigation of Former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s Disclosure of Sensitive Investigative Information and Handling of Certain Memoranda” of 08/2019 had 5 instances of “Corney”
Did anyone ever figure out the significance of Corney vs Comey?
***
IIRC, the intentional misspelling was used to foil search attempts in certain documents which contain his name. In the misspelling, the r and the n were so closely spaced that to the casual reader it looked like Comey. My guess/recollection is that the documents in question contained damming details, but I don’t recall what those specific documents were.