Says grassy knoll man was smoking weed not shooting a gun 🤪
Trump was in the
“Grassy Knoll!”
Let’s see....What can we use for a distraction....so these folks don’t catch on to what the other hand is doing.
Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick (Full Movie)
It's long, not for one sitting, but riveting IMHO. Covers a lot of territory on the Deep State, and JFK murder is just one facet.
Saw somewhere else there’s a lot of dusty junk on the patsy Lee Harvey Oswald but not on the assassins themselves.
I’m tired of laughing over it all so I won’t.
Wake me when something really happens.
According to
Michelle Morrissette-—at JFK Researcher
During his questioning Lee Harvey Oswald was administered a paraffin test by W. E. Barnes of the Dallas Police Department. In this test warm paraffin, which is applied to the skin to open up its pores, collects contaminants. If the suspect had fired a gun, one potential contaminant would be the nitrates from gun powder residue. Once the paraffin hardens, either diphenylamine or diphenylbenzidine is introduced to the paraffin cast, which will turn it blue in the presence of nitrates. Thus, the presence of blue dots on the paraffin casts is evidence that the suspect had fired a gun.
A paraffin test was applied to Oswald’s hands and right cheek; his hands reacted positively, whereas his cheek did not. Since shooting a rifle should have exposed his right cheek to gunpowder, the negative reaction is often cited as evidence that he did not fire a rifle. One such example of a writer citing this test as proof Oswald did not shoot a rifle is Oglesby, from The JFK Assassination: The Facts and the Theories, p. 283:
Nitrate tests performed on Oswald when he was arrested supported his claim that he had not fired a rifle in the previous 24 hours.
Mark Lane makes a similar assertion in Rush to Judgment, p. 149:
A positive response on both hands and a negative response on the face is consistent with innocence. It is also consistent with Oswald’s claim that he had not fired a rifle on November 22.
And that treasure trove of conspiracy lore, Jim Marrs’ Crossfire, makes a similar claim:
Another important piece of evidence involved a paraffin test made on Oswald the day of the assassination. The results of this test presented evidence that Oswald may not have fired a rifle that day, yet these results were downplayed and even suppressed by the federal authorities.
. . .
Oswald’s hands both reacted positively to the paraffin test, indicating the presence of nitrates. But a cast of his right cheek showed no reaction. Any competent defense attorney would have pointed to this test as evidence that his client had not fired a rifle. (pp. 442-443)
///////////////////////////
Note: Some said later that the old 1963 test method was faulty and produced false positives and false negatives but it was impossible to apply good methods to the already completed Oswald tests later.
Surprise! It was the KGB
p
Some of these people are still in Washington
Just more lies to get our hopes up, only to sucker us. Nothing new, and no answers.
And all those that were behind it, get the last laugh, AGAIN.