Posting stuff about Japan’s methods about administering the vaccine and also post stuff saying Japan stopped administering vaccines entirely and switched over to all ivermectin treatment only. https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4008842/posts Both of those things obviously cannot be true.
You also post multiple posts about supposedly better alternative treatments for COVID19, then also post articles saying that COVID19 doesn’t even exist. Both of those things obviously cannot be true.
When you care about truth and the facts you don’t have to have a good memory. Just posting random stuff regardless of the facts and the truth appearing on a variety of fake news websites with the only requirement apparently for you being that it paints vaccines in negative light doesn’t accomplish that. This is why you have zero - zero - credibility.
It’s Ok: I’m sure he accepts your apology.
I have a brain and can judge for myself.
As do many of us here.
Whom do you imagine logs on to find out what Republican Wildcat thinks of others posting on FR?
People are here to sift through available information and share analysis. They think for themselves. Get over yourself.
You pro vaxxers have no embarrassment, shame or morals.
The pay must be really good.
Sputtering troll is sputtering in defeat.
Kek.
Articles on all sides of an issue are much appreciated so we can read for ourselves and make informed judgements. I, for one, appreciate such a variety of articles from ransomnote.
Do you expect a person to be so dogmatic and rigid as to only post articles from a certain and fixed viewpoint? It would be very boring if we all had a rigid doctrine and only posted articles supporting that doctrine.
What do you have against a variety of viewpoints? Why should a person posting articles that tackle a topic from different perspectives have no credibility?