Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum

While this 1650s painting may have features and subtext discernible to the experts, to me it appears that the unknown artist was also indulging in an exercise of reverse coloration. Looking from the bust line up and disregarding the hair, see how the pearls look and how the 'face paintings' differ. I get the feeling that this artist was using his skill to show the equivalent of a 'photo reversal'.

I also find the 1650s dating of interest as this was when Oliver Cromwell was ruling as 'Lord Protector' of England (1653-58). Given the strong Puritanism that prevailed after the regicide of Charles I in 1649, I wonder if this painting, with the gowns and pearls, was a dig against the Puritan fundamentalism that advocated simple dark clothing and decried adornment.

2 posted on 12/12/2021 2:51:19 AM PST by SES1066 (Ask not what the LEFT can do for you, rather ask what the LEFT is doing to YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SES1066
Same amount of sclera in the eyes showing.

Good catch!

4 posted on 12/12/2021 3:39:57 AM PST by Does so (Americans had no desire for war in 1939 and 1941.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SES1066

I disagree. The two girls have different hair and features.


6 posted on 12/12/2021 4:12:57 AM PST by dinodino ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SES1066

In my post #12...I called it a mirror image which is probably the same as your photo reversal.


13 posted on 12/12/2021 5:43:10 AM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SES1066

Excellent comments. I agree.


15 posted on 12/12/2021 6:41:24 AM PST by sauropod (Meanie Butt Daddy - No you can't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson