Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

“Chinese leather armor”

I don’t think they are using this term correctly.... the whole basis of the article is that the armor was made in Mesopotamia and not China...they should instead be calling it either middle-easter, Mesopotamian, or neo-assyrian armor.

The only reason to call it Chinese is because of where it was geographically unearthed.


6 posted on 12/10/2021 10:53:33 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reed13k

“The only reason to call it Chinese is because of where it was geographically unearthed.”

I think today that is considered racist.


17 posted on 12/10/2021 11:37:47 AM PST by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson