Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2,600-Year-Old Leather Armor Found In China Was Made By Neo-Assyrians [Maybe]
Ancient Origins ^ | 10 DECEMBER, 2021 - 13:58 | NATHAN FALDE

Posted on 12/10/2021 10:48:30 AM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: BenLurkin
What is the capital of Neo-Assyria?


21 posted on 12/10/2021 1:17:16 PM PST by rfp1234 (Comitia asinorum et rhinocerum delenda sunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
an ancient horse-riding soldier in Northwest China .... These tests showed the armor had been created sometime between 786 and 543 BC.
Horses date back into the Shang era, but weren't used with riders in Chinese warfare until the BC 4th century, so these soldiers came from somewhere else.
22 posted on 12/10/2021 3:18:36 PM PST by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Sumerians were centuries, actually millennia earlier. The Sumerian civilization arose around 5000 BC. Around 2500 BC various Semitic people ie nomads came to live between the Sumerian cities. The two assimilated. By 1000 BC, ie after the bronze age collapse of 1440 BC, Sumerian language was relegated yo a liturgical language, like hebrew in 1 AD or Latin today.

The people were mixed.

The old Assyrian kingdom was before the collapse.

The new ie neo Assyrian kingdom arose in 900 BC


23 posted on 12/11/2021 4:56:28 AM PST by Cronos ( One cannot desire freedom from the Cross, especially when one is especially chosen for the cross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition; epluribus_2; Cronos

Neo-Sumerians? There were no Neo-Sumerians.

Perhaps you meant Neo-Babylonians, which marked the post-Assyrian revival of Babylon as a major capital. During the (so-called) Neo-Assyrian era, Babylon served as a secondary capital. Both groups used a Semitic language.

The term Neo-Assyrian has itself enjoyed a resurgence, but it is a meaningless term, really. Older survey works refer to Sargon the Great (founder of the Akkadian Empire), Sargon I (eventually dropped, as he turned out to be a modern invention) and Sargon II (now called Sargon, or sometimes Sargon II, now done to differentiate him from Sargon the Great). In the 1960s correspondence was found on a cuneiform tablet showing Hammurabi of Babylonia and King Shamshi-Adad I of Assyria to be contemporaries, and Sargon I just ceased to exist along with about three and a half centuries of phantom history.

As Cronos noted, the earlier Assyrian Empire is and has been referred to as the Akkadian Empire (after the capital city of that period) and overlapped the end of the Sumerian city-states. The Akkadians adopted Sumer’s cuneiform writing system and preserved some of its literature.


24 posted on 12/11/2021 7:16:41 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 240B; 75thOVI; Adder; albertp; asgardshill; At the Window; bitt; blu; BradyLS; cajungirl; ...
Digest ping. The other GGG topics added since last digest ping:

25 posted on 12/11/2021 7:23:31 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Needs a little oil...should bring it right back...


26 posted on 12/11/2021 9:11:51 AM PST by Adder (Proud member of the FJB/LGB community. /s is implied where applicable..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Cronos
Ur III

Not going to argue with you, my darling!


27 posted on 12/12/2021 10:21:17 AM PST by Daffynition (*This admin tells us *A* story; but they don't tell us *THE* story* & :) ~ D Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Of course Hammurabi ruled before muzzies took over and prohibited pork...


28 posted on 12/12/2021 10:35:29 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The Demagogic Party is a collection of violent, rival street gangs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

[snip] The Third Dynasty of Ur is commonly abbreviated as Ur III by historians studying the period. It is numbered in reference to previous dynasties, such as the First Dynasty of Ur (26-25th century BCE), but it seems the once supposed Second Dynasty of Ur was never recorded. The Third Dynasty... began after several centuries of control by Akkadian and Gutian kings. It controlled the cities of Isin, Larsa, and Eshnunna and extended as far north as Upper Mesopotamia... some time after the fall of the Akkad Dynasty. The period between the last powerful king of the Akkad Dynasty, Shar-Kali-Sharri, and the first king of Ur III, Ur-Nammu, is not well documented, but most Assyriologists posit that there was a brief "dark age" ...On the king-lists, Shar-Kali-Sharri is followed by two more kings of Akkad and six in Uruk; however, there are no year names surviving for any of these, nor even any artifacts confirming that any of these reigns was historical — save one artifact for Dudu of Akkad (Shar-Kali-Sharri's immediate successor on the list). [/snip]

29 posted on 12/12/2021 10:40:29 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson