Jane Long wrote: “Why don’t YOU provide some solid, evidence-based, scientific refutation of his arguments instead of providing useless hit pieces by leftist Forbes as your argument?”
Why don’t YOU provide some solid, evidence-based, scientific proof of his arguments? The only reason some support ‘Dr’ Stock is the fact that they agree with his anti-vaxxer narrative.
Go ahead and google Dr. Dan Stock. You’ll find reports from credible sources that debunk his anti-vaxxer narratives.
Here’s one:
https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/addressing-dr-daniel-stock-claims?rq=Stock
You might also be interested in this court case that . Daniel Stock, M.D., breached his duty of care to Violet Huggins by failing to act with the degree of skill possessed and exercised by a reasonably careful, skillful and prudent practitioner of general practice/family practice medicine treating such maladies under the same or similar circumstances. The court ordered a judgement of $774K for the Huggins.
https://www.anylaw.com/case/stock-v-huggins/indiana-court-of-appeals/10-04-2006/W7C4S2YBTlTomsSBRnz5
LOL...your usual drive-by “anti-vaxxer” smear.
So expected, from the $hift Working $hot $hill.
You know that I am NOT anti-REAL-vax, as I’ve explained that to you, on your numerous $hifts.
There has been thread after thread of “solid, evidence-based, REAL scientific” proof of what Dr Stock as said, that have been posted....many of which you have $hift trolled with your “anti-vax” blather.