Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew

In ViaCyte’s current design an isolation capsule keeps the allogeneic stem cells (taken from another person) from interacting with the host’s body. This would cause an immune response that would kill the islet stem cells. This means the implant has to be fairly large and complex to maintain a barrier while still allowing blood flow into the capsule to keep the stem cells alive.

A future design developed with CRISPR Therapeutics is a gene edited version of this implant. The gene editing knocks out the genes in the allogeneic stem cells that trigger the immune rejection response. This will allow a much smaller, simpler, and inexpensive implant that should be lower risk and last a lifetime.


11 posted on 12/06/2021 7:17:02 PM PST by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Dave Wright

Thank you most kindly for the response. My question is of a “yes” or “no” nature. Probably a lack of mental acuity on my part, so the question remains: Does human stem cell use require taking the life of an innocent human being?

I am going out on a limb here to interpret your answer as saying, “Not necessairly.” Am I right or wrong on that?


12 posted on 12/06/2021 7:50:19 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (No nation that sanctions the wholesale slaughter of its unborn citizens is fit to endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson