Posted on 12/03/2021 12:05:27 PM PST by ransomnote
Any time one even mentions a story, data, or even VAERS numbers showing serious injury or death resulting from the vaccine, the bio-medical state lobby close their ears and shout while their censors in Big Tech label it as misinformation. But now we have it from the horse’s mouth – Pfizer’s own vaccine injury data – a shocking amount of death and injury that is likely under-reported. This means that the FDA knew from day one these vaccines were unsafe to the point that they would typically be denied authorization, and certainly not funded, mandated, and marketed with a budget and energy that have never been placed behind a product since the dawn of time.
SNIP
Full stop right there. Under any other circumstance, such a vaccine would have been removed from the market right away, certainly not fully endorsed, marketed, funded, and mandated by government. It was so bad that Pfizer reveals, “Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritized the processing of serious cases” and also had to hire more full-time employees to handle the reporting.
MORE AT LINK
Parts of the Nuremberg Code was already incorporated into US Federal Code. See link for some of those:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4018034/posts?page=46#46
I’m posting the numbers given. There’s no pretense involved in data.
ANyone with a brain that can bothers to read the article could also read Pfitzer’s disclosure. Why should it be included in bold type on a forum post that is isolating US numbers?
Try to diminish what Pfitzer reported all you want, but people can make up their own minds from the data. And even go to the report to look up the UK or German or whatever numbers for comparison. They don’t need some sensationalist pandemicprofiteer soliciting donations and clicks interpreting data for them.
DuncanWaring wrote: “If someone in Congress were to introduce a bill to incorporate the Nuremberg Code into US law, would you support the passage of that bill?”
We’ve done quite well without it. I believe the only reason some want to incorporate it is because they think that would stop vaccine mandates. Probably a lot more complex than one might think.
cuz1961 wrote: “Well allen, cuz lies are bad.”
Not at all relevant.
cuz1961 wrote: “Well allen, cuz lies are bad.”
Not at all relevant
/\
Wow.
Took you about 20 hours to come up with that ?
Bwaaa ha ha ha.
You’re slipping Allen.
Well of course lies are irrelevant to your ilk,
you just proved my point.
Continuing to dance around the obvious truth, that you are in favor of allowing forced medical treatments and experiments.
DuncanWaring wrote: “Continuing to dance around the obvious truth, that you are in favor of allowing forced medical treatments and experiments.”
The only position I’ve taken is that the Nuremburg is not part of the US Code. Can you prove otherwise?
In your Post 63 you also took the position that it should not be part of the US Code.
DuncanWaring wrote: “In your Post 63 you also took the position that it should not be part of the US Code.”
DugwayDuke: “We’ve done quite well without it. I believe the only reason some want to incorporate it is because they think that would stop vaccine mandates. Probably a lot more complex than one might think.”
No, that says I don’t know if we should or not. I think you only want the NC incorporated because you think it will stop the vaccine mandates. Well, too bad, but the vaccines are not ‘experimental’. They’ve been fully approved. I hesitate to jump into something that’s probably very complex. I point out that we’ve had over seventy years to incorporate but have not. If we’ve survived that long without it, why should we act now?
BTW, I do think it is reprehensible to consider Nazi medical experiments as comparable to the covid vaccines.
You keep bringing this up because you want to accuse me of supporting medical experiments on unwilling personnel. I’ve not taken that position.
Perhaps you might wish to read this:
“As the UK Covid-19 vaccine roll out has gathered pace, and the use of “vaccine passports” continue to be debated, an increasing number of social media users are voicing their opposition to these moves and claiming they are an infringement of their rights under the Nuremberg Code.
https://fullfact.org/health/nuremberg-code-covid/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.