Social media is trying to put the quietus on this report.
The vaccine isn’t just for sterilizing children
“The abstract is not a peer-reviewed published paper. The AHA has said that the abstract is unreliable because it lacks data and contains errors.”
https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/8667a706
Bookmark.
So a man goes from a 1 in 10 chance of developing heart disease to a 1 in 4 chance.
Let double down on the mandate.
“Rare”...
Oh, it’s about a month old. Interesting.
There was NO warning from the American Heart Association.
This same garbage is being posted again and again and again.
This article expresses concern regarding abstract “Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning” which originally published November 8, 2021; https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712.
Soon after publication of the above abstract in Circulation, it was brought to the American Heart Association Committee on Scientific Sessions Program’s attention that there are potential errors in the abstract. Specifically, there are several typographical errors, there is no data in the abstract regarding myocardial T-cell infiltration, there are no statistical analyses for significance provided, and the author is not clear that only anecdotal data was used.
We are publishing this Expression of Concern until a suitable correction is published to indicate that the abstract in its current version may not be reliable.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001051
“As of June 21, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration had confirmed 393 cases of myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, or pericarditis, inflammation of the sac that surrounds the heart, in people 30 and younger who had received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. That’s out of more than 300 million doses administered in the U.S.”
https://www.heart.org/en/news/2021/06/21/should-rare-cases-of-heart-inflammation-put-your-covid-19-vaccine-plans-on-hold
and for some general perspective:
Projections of Cardiovascular
Disease Prevalence and Costs:
2015–2035
“In 2015, 41.5% of the U.S. population (more than 100 million people) was projected to have some form of CVD. By 2035, CVD prevalence is expected to increase to 45.1% (more than 130 million people). This represents a 30% increase in the number of people with CVD over the next 20 years. Counts of people with coronary heart disease, CHF, stroke, and atrial fibrillation are expected to increase by more than 40% each between 2015 and 2035.
Between 2015 and 2035, real total direct medical costs of CVD are projected to more than double from $318 billion to $749 billion. Real indirect costs (due to lost productivity) for all CVDs are estimated to increase from $237 billion in 2015 to $368 billion in 2035 (55% increase). Total (medical and indirect) costs of CVD are expected to double from $555
billion in 2015 to $1.1 trillion in 2035. Across all conditions, relative increases in costs are expected to be the highest (more than triple) among persons aged 80 or older and Hispanics.
These findings indicate that CVD prevalence and costs are projected to increase substantially.”
https://www.heart.org/-/media/Files/About-Us/Policy-Research/Fact-Sheets/ucm_491513.pdf
Don’t worry. Just get the RotoRooter job. I did. It was a real party. I and the medical staff shared Perrier-Jouet (I’m not wealthy) after it was over and I danced the night away.
there’s NO “warning from the American Heart Association” ...
there’s simply a research article by an independent 3rd party published in an AHA publication called “Circulation”:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
in point of fact, the AHA attached a note of concern to the article:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001051
Expression of Concern: Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
This article expresses concern regarding abstract “Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase En-
dothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning” which originally published November 8, 2021;
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
.
Soon after publication of the above abstract in
Circulation, it was brought to the American Heart Association Committee on Scientific Sessions Program’s attention that there are potential errors in the abstract. Specifically, there are several typographical errors, there is no data in the abstract regarding myocardial T-cell infiltration, there are no statistical analyses for significance provided, and the author is not clear that only anecdotal data was used.
We are publishing this Expression of Concern until a suitable correction is published to indicate that the abstract in its current version may not be reliable