Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

More top of the line journalism from the hacks at “The Daily Expose”.

The headline says:

“Study finds Covid Vaccines increase the risk of Heart Attack by 127%”

The body of the article says:

“.. a new scientific study suggests the Covid vaccines increase the risk of suffering a heart attack by 127%.”

So, which is it? Definitive or suggestive?

Only the hacks at “The Daily Expose” know for sure I guess.


5 posted on 12/02/2021 1:58:40 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fury

Meanwhile, people are sickening and dying of post vax illnesses, including cardiac arrest, myocarditis, periocarditis etc....but don’t let that interfere with your ‘tactics’.


6 posted on 12/02/2021 2:01:33 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

SUGGESTS why they do not want a control group


8 posted on 12/02/2021 2:03:10 PM PST by joshua c (Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001051


“This article expresses concern regarding abstract “Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning” which originally published November 8, 2021; https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712.

Soon after publication of the above abstract in Circulation, it was brought to the American Heart Association Committee on Scientific Sessions Program’s attention that there are potential errors in the abstract. Specifically, there are several typographical errors, there is no data in the abstract regarding myocardial T-cell infiltration, there are no statistical analyses for significance provided, and the author is not clear that only anecdotal data was used.

We are publishing this Expression of Concern until a suitable correction is published to indicate that the abstract in its current version may not be reliable.”


12 posted on 12/02/2021 2:10:17 PM PST by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdz oncmccRthym,.dadfjl,dz )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
So, which is it? Definitive or suggestive? Only the hacks at “The Daily Expose” know for sure I guess.

Meanwhile, there's that pesky study, vax droid.

Furry, tireless warrior for the derp state.


25 posted on 12/02/2021 5:10:17 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Fury; bagster; ransomnote; Jane Long
Still more accurate than either

"Two weeks to slow the spread"

or

"Safe and Effective"


35 posted on 12/02/2021 9:10:17 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson