Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

So, in the figures “relevant cases” listed as 42086. Deaths listed as 1223. That’s about 0.029…. Let’s say 0.03% incident ratio.
Folks, that’s a 3 in 100 chance of DYING from the vaccine. Their numbers!!


14 posted on 12/01/2021 4:30:58 PM PST by Texaspeptoman (Even cannibals... get fed up with people sometimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texaspeptoman

Paging the FR jab cadres! Tell us again about the science fiction you call science and how you have to maim or kill us to save us!


16 posted on 12/01/2021 4:35:15 PM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Texaspeptoman

0.029 is 2.9%, not 0.029% or 0.03%.


17 posted on 12/01/2021 4:36:58 PM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Texaspeptoman

Wouldn’t “relevant cases” refer to the number of reported problems?

To get the percentage of people who have had adverse reactions/death from the jab, you’d need to know the total number of shots administered, which is redacted.


34 posted on 12/01/2021 5:08:53 PM PST by DC Bound (FUCK JOE BIDEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Texaspeptoman

Not exactly. They redacted how many people were given the vaccine. The total group of 42,000 is just the people with adverse reactions and not the total group given the vaccine.


55 posted on 12/01/2021 9:39:05 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.I ha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson