“My ring fingers are the same size as my index fingers.
I used to be a massage therapist and saw many, many hands. There is no standard about length of various fingers and sex. It is infinitely variable. Men have bigger hands generally, and thicker, but that also depends on size of the man and what they do.
The idea that a woman whose ring fingers are as long as index finger is a man is beyond stupid. I just happen to have long fingers overall. Been a female my whole life.”
`````````````````````
This metric is published many places. (http://www.directorioacapulco.com/14-real-physical-differences-between-men-and-women-besides-the-obvious.html“
“9. You can tell a lot about someone by looking at their hands. In general, a woman’s index finger is longer than the finger next to her pinkie; men’s index finger is shorter than the finger next to their pinkie.”
It is a known marker for gender, and related to androgen levels. “It is difficult to measure the level of androgens a human fetus is exposed to in utero, and research on the subject is often informed by postnatal biomarkers assumed to reflect prenatal androgen exposure. Of these, the most researched is the ratio of the length of the second digit to that of the fourth digit (2D:4D). There is a robust sex difference in this ratio; with men having a lower 2D:4D than women (Grimbos et al., 2010; Xu & Zheng, 2015). This sex difference emerges early in fetal development (Galis et al., 2010).” https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-021-02095-5
This noted, documented male vs female characteristic is not “beyond stupid”. Your personal experience may differ, however.
Okay, all women with ring finger same as index finger are trannies. Real life experience means nothing compared to real scientific sites that you meantion/sarc.
From your first link, an example of the serious sciencey stuff they say:
“Men are large, hairy apes. Men develop large musty patches of hair all over their bodies after puberty, making them look a lot like the legendary Sasquatch of the Pacific Northwest. Women have less hair than men and are thus more fully human.”
And the index finger sciencey stuff:
“You can tell a lot about someone by looking at their hands. In general, a woman’s index finger is longer than the finger next to her pinkie; men’s index finger is shorter than the finger next to their pinkie.”
And the second “sciencey” article? Why, an article showing that homos are born that way - a lie pushed by the homo agenda crowd, plus it’s saying women are bascially bi. Hypothesis etc. Plus, the article below states that “index to ring finger” isn’t even clear which finger they thing is is lower in men.” Clutching at straws.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-021-02095-5
Sexual Orientation, Sexual Arousal, and Finger Length Ratios in Women
“In general, women show physiological sexual arousal to both sexes. However, compared with heterosexual women, homosexual women are more aroused to their preferred sex, a pattern typically found in men. We hypothesized that homosexual women’s male-typical arousal is due to their sex-atypical masculinization during prenatal development. We measured the sexual responses of 199 women (including 67 homosexual women) via their genital arousal and pupil dilation to female and male sexual stimuli. Our main marker of masculinization was the ratio of the index to ring finger, which we expected to be lower (a masculine pattern) in homosexual women due to increased levels of prenatal androgens etcetc.”
“In general” is the important part of that statement on fingers.
Too many people take something like that and treat it as a 100% law of nature.
But if you see someone with too many exceptions then you can suspect a trannie.