Okay, all women with ring finger same as index finger are trannies. Real life experience means nothing compared to real scientific sites that you meantion/sarc.
From your first link, an example of the serious sciencey stuff they say:
“Men are large, hairy apes. Men develop large musty patches of hair all over their bodies after puberty, making them look a lot like the legendary Sasquatch of the Pacific Northwest. Women have less hair than men and are thus more fully human.”
And the index finger sciencey stuff:
“You can tell a lot about someone by looking at their hands. In general, a woman’s index finger is longer than the finger next to her pinkie; men’s index finger is shorter than the finger next to their pinkie.”
And the second “sciencey” article? Why, an article showing that homos are born that way - a lie pushed by the homo agenda crowd, plus it’s saying women are bascially bi. Hypothesis etc. Plus, the article below states that “index to ring finger” isn’t even clear which finger they thing is is lower in men.” Clutching at straws.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-021-02095-5
Sexual Orientation, Sexual Arousal, and Finger Length Ratios in Women
“In general, women show physiological sexual arousal to both sexes. However, compared with heterosexual women, homosexual women are more aroused to their preferred sex, a pattern typically found in men. We hypothesized that homosexual women’s male-typical arousal is due to their sex-atypical masculinization during prenatal development. We measured the sexual responses of 199 women (including 67 homosexual women) via their genital arousal and pupil dilation to female and male sexual stimuli. Our main marker of masculinization was the ratio of the index to ring finger, which we expected to be lower (a masculine pattern) in homosexual women due to increased levels of prenatal androgens etcetc.”
I did 1 search on DuckDuckGo and 1 search on PubMed, and the items posted were in the first pop. The ratio of index finger length to ring finger length is a known metric with respect to gender. I could dig up more data, but will not at this time. I am only addressing your “beyond stupid” statement.
Just because it is not your personal experience, does not make it “beyond stupid”. Data are readily available. Please be aware that there are ample data to the contrary beyond your purview and refuting your judgement.
It’s ok to learn something.
** Why, an article showing that homos are born that way **
anne heche kills that theory.