Depends on what is said.
So I guess more and more FReepers are devolving into the mindset they can go in private property with the intent of disrupting a person’s “pursuit of happiness”.
Sort of like junior Antifa and BLM members, I suppose.
"Life, liberty, and property", was changed to "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" for a reason. They don't mean the same thing, or why change it in the first place? Why do you insist on trying to make them the same thing? Are you a founding father returned from the past?
Stop being an intellectual midget, Furry. We won't fall for your pretzel logic, my dear.
My pursuit of happiness requires that I not wear a mask, so in your comic book, its a tie. That puts us back to so-called property rights, and I have already educated you on that canard.
Have a nice day.
Ping for your reading enjoyment. Lots of justification by some posters for disrupting business on private property, and disrespecting private property rights in general, because, well, they have rights!
Also some novel ideas on how the Bill of Rights operates by some on this thread. Makes one consider that perhaps grade inflation started in K-12 several decades ago.
“Depends on what is said.”
Partly - because the First Amendment doesn’t protect certain speech, such as liable, perjury, threats of violence, and more recently, “hate speech”, whatever that is.
But partly not - because private property has no bearing on those exceptions.
My free speech is protected even on private property - not my right to lawful assembly - but my right free speech.
In fact, in many SC cases, free speech is actually protected far less robustly on public property than on private property.