Any suggestions about what can be done to lower the inflammation and other markers?
Not surprised.
I’ve been taking baby aspirin intermittently since taking the clot shots required for a trip I went on.
I’ve also seen some recommendations to take proteolytic enzymes to try to reduce the spike proteins produced.
That is confusing. How can they assert a five year increase in ACS risk if the changes persist at least 2.5 months post vac #2? The last sentence suggests the elevated risk is short term and diminishes.
How to interpret these findings?
This is what happens when you complain about animals, etc. being used for test subjects.....you/we become the test subject(s). /s
“Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA)”
It is the PULS test, not the PLUS test. “Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac.”
All those “=/-“ should be “+/-“.
The PULS Test web site does not list any company name anywhere, even on the “Contact Us” page. The paper identifies GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA, but that company name is not on the web site.
The web page does not list any research papers validating or evaluating the PULS test.
The author (Steven R Gundry) does not list any credentials other than his “group,” The International Heart and Lung Institute, Palm Springs, CA.
These may be minor things, but they all seem odd. It reads like a promotion to sell the PULS test kits.
SAN DIEGO, CALIF. (PRWEB) MARCH 17, 2015
Dr. Douglas Harrington, FCAP - Clinical Professor at USC Keck School of Medicine and Dr. Americo Simonini, FACC - Cardiologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center presented “Early-detection of Coronary Heart Disease with an Advanced Proteomic & Predictive Algorithm Demonstrates Improved Patient Outcome” on Saturday, March 14th in the Patient Engagement Pavilion at the 2015 American College of Cardiology Conference (ACC).
The special presentation supported by the GUARDaHEART Foundation, provided physicians and other healthcare providers the latest information on how the PULS Cardiac TestTM, which has been validated and confirmed in other studies and demonstrates clinical utility in identifying asymptomatic patients with subclinical CHD, allows for timely critical intervention and prevention strategies.
Drs. Harrington and Simonini presented patient case studies where the PULS Test (which conforms to ACC/AHA (ATP IV) guidelines) identified asymptomatic, at-risk patients and helped motivate patient compliance to physician prevention strategies.
Bookmark
So I guess the American Heart Association is canceled now for “spreading misinformation.”
.
Any other drug with these side effects would be pulled from the shelves by the FDA, or at least given a black box warning. Can you imagine what a 30 second commercial for that product would look like? They’d run out of time listing potential side effects.
All this data coming out and they still want to jab all the kids...
We are in a new Dark Ages - marked by economic, intellectual, and cultural decline.
And America has taken the place of the fallen “Holy Roman Empire” in the reenactment of a huge decline in society.
So, no problemo then.
The last Paragraph is All
I needed to understand that
the Jab is Bad for People with Heart issues,
Thanks!