Also an example of cognitive dissonance.
There’s the false media narrative that Kyle was a white supremacist there to hunt black people. He was a minor with a gun who crossed state lines militia proud boy. So they heard that month after month.
Okay. Now here comes all the actual evidence showing every bit of that is bs.
So the prosecution pivoted to the “provocation” can’t bring a gun to a fist fight and the gun itself is provocation. They were heroes trying to disarm the killer.
WE see through the loses. But if you bought into the lie here’s a way to keep that POV.
Libs are all about how they will be perceived. There’s no way they’ll side with the working class “Trumpkin” Kyle. They’ll sacrifice his freedom and life on the altar of wokeness.
Jury selection is where the case went wrong. After that it was guaranteed to be a hung jury.
A retrial cuts out the curfew charge and the the gun charge. Kyle can appeal the denial of a mistrial with prejudice. They should do the hearing with sworn in witnesses the judge mentioned over the issue of drone footage.
So a retrial is a good way to go at this point.
If KR was in Kenosha to ‘hunt’ then why was he carrying a First-Aid Kit and scrubbing graffiti? Oh and giving an interview about being there to help defend Life and Property. If KR were there just to kill, why not mut some optics on that AR and set in a sniper position and wait for dark?