” Surely the judge will intervene with ‘mistrial w/prejudice’”
You are joking , right ?
I am actually hopeful the judge is waiting it out to give Kyle a shot at full acquittal, before he declares a mistrial with prejudice.
That would take an extraordinary gutsy move. This judge has demonstrated a sensitivity to the MSM coverage and that isn’t a good sign.
>>> I am actually hopeful the judge is waiting it out to give Kyle a shot at full acquittal, before he declares a mistrial with prejudice.
I said the same thing in another thread...
Then someone pointed out that a mistrial with prejudice is pretty much the same thing as a dismissal... they cannot bring the same charges in a subsequent trial.
Jury would be off the hook, and it would all be on the judge.