The Pack Knight wrote: |
What a bullshit headline. According to the article, the MHRA didn’t “confirm” anything. |
Hmmm...what a coincidence. The information in the headline matches the information in the article, but once again, supposedly a conservative is trashing the information, claiming it's fake. Why would a conservative hack away at valid data? Wouldn't a conservative want us to have access to valid data? How...odd.
Here's the numerator the Regulator confirmed (they already had the denominator):
Instead they revealed that they had received a total of 404 reported adverse reactions to all available vaccines (excluding the Covid-19 injections) associated with a fatal outcome between the 1st January 2001 and the 25th August 2021 – a time frame of 20 years and 8 months.
Here's the denominator provided in the article:
Pfizer 577
Astrazeneca 1112
Moderna 18
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Total=1697
1697/404= 4.2 times more deaths due to Covid "vaccines" than all others.
"Meaning there have been over four times as many deaths in just 10 months due to the Covid-19 vaccines than there have been due to every other available vaccine since the year 2001,"
But I'm just guessing that you want people to think you were right and to falsely believe you proved it was fake news, when in fact it is a valuable scrap of information, hard won in the battle between citizens and their tyrananical governments. Well, you chose your side.
“Spontaneous suspected ADR reports.” They are comparing reports of “suspected” adverse reactions. They are not “confirming” that any deaths were “due to” any vaccine, as claimed by the headline. Do you understand the difference?