My first question is is this a trustworthy news source?
If this is true, heads should role.
“My first question is is this a trustworthy news source?”
2nd this. I have seen a lot of questionable articles from this source...for example that declining immune study.
I have no doubt the shots are bad for pregnant women, my dil, a surgeon is pregnant and not getting them which is what I base my decision on.
I won’t get the shots either, but that is based on understanding the history of medicine in the US and the lethality of this common cold variant. My decision...if you feel you need the shots then go for it.
My first question is is this a trustworthy news source?
If this is true, heads should role.
***************************************************************************************
I can’t say about the source, but it is basically true. The actual study was posted here some time back and we discussed it on that thread.
It was noted that the incidence prior to the third trimester was about 80%. However a great many recipients in the study were not accounted for and it didn’t say why.
Also the study noted that additional data was needed, especially for the women that were in early stages of their pregnancy.
So they threw enough weasel words in there to shield them from any blow back. They’ll likely excuse it as “failure to be clear” - not a deliberate concealment.