Posted on 11/04/2021 5:34:09 AM PDT by ransomnote
ransomnote: audio version of the story is available at the top of the webpage at the link.
Citing “grave errors” in a CDC study published in April 2021 in The New England Journal of Medicine, two New Zealand researchers are calling for an immediate halt to COVID mRNA vaccination of children and pregnant women.
An article by Dr. Joseph Mercola, 3 November 2021
The CDC study already had a correction made to it in October 2021, when the authors admitted they couldn’t calculate an actual pregnancy risk estimate because “at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants.”
However, the New Zealand researchers, Simon Thornley, Ph.D., and Aleisha Brock, Ph.D., argue that using data isolated only from third-trimester pregnancies is inappropriate to apply to an entire gestational period. In their look at the CDC study, “the incidence of miscarriages in the first trimester was actually 82% to 91% of the women who were vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation,” Thornley and Brock say.
Thornley and Brock also list several other points that make the CDC’s study flawed, such as the fact that there were incidents of pre-eclampsia-like syndrome in vaccinated women and that there was approximately two times the risk of pre-implantation loss in an animal study. “The sweeping conclusions of safety … are not convincing, given their study’s limitation … we suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy … and breastfeeding … along with the withdrawal of mRNA to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population,” Thornley and Brock conclude.
When the duo sent a note to the authors of the study, a CDC spokesperson responded instead, saying the CDC was aware that higher miscarriage risks had been calculated by others, but miscarriage rates for pregnancy are 10% to 25% anyway, and that “growing evidence about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy demonstrates that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine outweigh any known or potential risks.”
Even so, Thornley told The Epoch Times that “we caution against the use of the vaccine, given the substantial uncertainty that exists.”
Sources:
ransomnote wrote: “Well then, you must object strenuously to the ‘vaccines’ being described as gene therapy in their FEC filings but renamed ‘vaccines”
How is that remotely relevant to your discredited claim that Fauci is making millions off the vaccines?
ransomnote wrote: “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayh%E2%80%93Dole_Act“
Now show the part that allows Fauci to personally profit from a patent held by NIH.
Do we the US own or pay for anything on Fauxchi’s property, services performed for his property(ies), etc.?
combat_boots wrote: “Do we the US own or pay for anything on Fauxchi’s property, services performed for his property(ies), etc.?”
Irrelevant.
The most loud mouthed propaganda pushers on fr, that claim to be physicians, refuse to acknowledge that the mRNA injection is gene therapy. As is unequivocally shown in the post this one replies to, and many others.
Trust them? Never.
Gassy is one. Right gassy?
I can’t help that you don’t understand basic biology
MRNA is created by reading DNA
Genes are in the nucleus is the cell. mRNA is transcribed in the cytoplasm into proteins.
You think you know what you are talking about but lack basic education to even discuss.
I don’t respond because it’s like arguing with someone convinced that 2+2 = Cleveland. It’s that nonsensical. If you don’t want to be educated that’s on you.
Wow- did you even read post 17?
The mRNA vaccines are gene therapy.
Your denial and name calling simply shows your dishonesty.
Please, continue to reveal yourself.
“ You think you know what you are talking about but lack basic education to even discuss.”
It is YOU that do not know what you are talking about.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
In the United States, and in the European Union, mRNA therapies have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products
And…..
Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.
Gassy claims to be a physician, but even if that is true I doubt he knows what 3’ and 5’ refer to wrt RNA.
Securities and Exchange Commission. Funny
I will see you the FDA and the SEC and raise you Watson and Crick. It is evident that you as well lack the basic understanding of what mRNA is. I will tell you what. Look up what a gene is and where it is. Then look up transcription and translation, and then tell me how its gene therapy — which it so say it alters the genes.
It is fundamental biology. Something people seem to have a fundamental lack of understanding. Answer the question instead of cutting and pasting an SEC ruling.
“ Answer the question instead of cutting and pasting an SEC ruling.”
Jim, you did not ask a question.
FYI…. I am very familiar with mRNA.
Triple referred to post #17 and in that post was what I posted. Triple said that you didn’t read post 17 so I showed you what was in that post.
Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. That’s the FDA Buckaroo…..
When the truth is staring them in the face and there’s no way to refute the evidence, their knee jerk reaction is to claim others are too uneducated to understand them. *eyeroll*
Exactly- they can never break their gaslighting character.
That would show weakness…
They do not know the power of TRUTH.
It is sad for them really, because when they finally realize that their gaslighting (either intentional, or from a true believer) is a complete fraud, and everyone knows it. They will be crushed by reality.
I pity gassy.
“Gassy is one. Right gassy?”
Uhh Gassy is a real one. Its just every now and then he has trouble telling left from right so he has to take a “Time Out” LOL.
And Sesame Street
Oh, just sickening.
I’m sure the FR Vaxshills are all in, with defending this type of hazardous shot manipulation, on our kids.
Not to mention FRAUDci’s ModeRNA investments.
And, BioLabShiftWorker goes after Mercola....pennies, comparatively.
But not pregnant men?
Jane Long wrote: “Not to mention FRAUDci’s ModeRNA investments.”
It would be a violation of federal regulations for Fauci to have any investments in mRNA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.